In the past I have managed the annual Memorial Day program at our community's flagpole. This year I am unable to, but nevertheless, our thoughts should be with all of those who, in all wars, have given their lives for this country. And it is not too far a stretch for us to include the war against Covid19 in that list of struggles.
JL
***
The Memorial Day front page of the New York
Times features a list of 1000 of us who have died from the Coronavirus
Pandemic. Heather Cox Richardson, the
Boston College history professor often quoted here (Google her name for her
frequent columns), had this to say about the Times front page:
“This dramatic cover does more than mark a stark number. It
rejects the toxic individualism embraced by a certain portion of Trump’s base.
These people refuse to isolate or wear masks either because they believe the
virus isn’t actually dangerous or because they insist that public health rules
infringe on their liberty or because, so far, the people most likely to die
have been elderly or people of color and they are not in those categories.
“It’s a personal choice,” one man told a reporter as a
wealthy suburb of Atlanta reopened. “If you want to stay home, stay home. If
you want to go out, you can go out. I’m not in the older population. If I was
to get it now, I’ve got a 90 percent chance of getting cured. Also, I don’t
know anybody who’s got it.” Another man agreed: “When you start seeing where
the cases are coming from and the demographics—I’m not worried.”
The New York Times cover
rejects this selfishness and reminds us that we are all in this together… or
should be.”
I agree. There
are certain individual actions which people can take which, intentionally or unintentionally,
usually the latter, affect others. One
doesn’t pull a fire alarm lever or shout “fire” in a theatre just to see the
people run and the engines come. We all
know that can cause harm to others.
And
because the Covid19 virus spreads from person to person, even the safe
“personal choice” the man from suburban Atlanta made does not preclude its
unintentional spread to those more vulnerable to the virus than he might be. We
don’t know if that man is positive or negative for the virus (see the prior
posting about the lack of dependability of testing), but if he is capable of
spreading the virus, without having symptoms himself, he is a danger to others
he encounters in his expanded “outside” life.
He might get a haircut in a supposedly 100% sanitized barber shop and
still leave a droplet of virus there for the next customer, possible more vulnerable than he, to spread
further. Sure, this is the other end of
the spectrum from calling out “fire” in a theatre, but it exists … and there
are a lot of “ifs” and "buts" involved … but real American lives are at stake.
I’ve had some “blowback” in regard to my
comments on testing in my last posting. Some think the published numbers are accurate. But I am not the only one thinking in another direction. Check out the following item from WLRN
(Public Radio in South Florida) to see someone who agrees with me.
|
***
What Bill Gates is All About
Bill Gates |
Papers throughout the country
have reproduced New York Times West Coast writer Timothy Egan’s recent column regarding
Bill Gates. I recommend that you read it
by CLICKING HERE. Do you agree? Then do something about it! In view of the truths Gates speaks there is a lot of phony criticism of him on the Internet. Read Egan's column and take it from there.
If the link didn't work, just visit: https://www.siliconvalley.com/2020/05/25/egan-in-covid-19-era-bill-gates-is-worlds-most-interesting-person/
No comments:
Post a Comment