Name Calling Ain't Nice
Most
of you are aware that the President takes pleasure in adding insulting
adjectives to the names of people he dislikes.
Examples are “Crooked Hillary,” “Crazy Bernie” and “Little Marco.” Conversely, most Democrats are too civil to start
referring to the President as “Cheatin’ Donald,” which I will do throughout
this posting. That would be totally
accurate in view of his repeated marital infidelities.
Remember
that while Hillary Clinton is not a “crook,”
that while Bernie Sanders has all of his wits about him and that while
Marco Rubio is 5’9” tall, “Cheatin’ Donald” was actually sleeping with Marla
while married to Ivana, and has committed adultery with both Stormy Daniels and
Karen McDougal. “Cheatin’ Donald” should learn to keep his mouth shut.
Jack Lippman
Early Warning and Not About Hurricanes
It
will be too late to save democracy in the United States if we reach the point
where a Trumpian Executive branch has so manipulated the Department of Justice
and its Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other Federal law enforcement
agencies, that they become tools of the Administration’s political agenda. Such an occurrence would amount to a
disregard of our Constitution and would be possible only with the acquiescence
or impotency of the Legislative and Judicial branches of our government. If this politized control ever extended even further and involved the armed forces, the game would be over … and Americans would be wise to
consider emigration, if it were still possible, to friendlier democratic nations
where they might seek asylum. Scary,
isn’t it. That’s why your political
involvement is necessary today to prevent this from happening.
JL
Mueller Report and the Thought of Impeachment
Barr, Who Violated his Oath of Office |
Attorney
General Barr forgot that his oath of office was to the Constitution and not to
“Cheatin’ Donald.” He provided a cushion for the Mueller report which despite
its heavy redactions was loaded with evidence of the pitiful level to which the President had sunk, but nevertheless which would not meet the
exacting standards required in a court of law to convict any defendant who had
hired a half-way competent attorney.
Those high standards, however, will not apply in the ultimate court of
jurisdiction in this action, the voice of the American voter in 2020.
The
real question, now, is whether they will be able to see enough of Mueller’s
actual findings to counteract the sanitized version of which the President’s
hand-picked Attorney General spoke before the redacted documents were released last
Thursday.
Many voters will not be
capable of seeing beyond that. That’s
why, as I recommended in earlier postings, that the Democrats not focus on “Cheatin’
Donald” in 2020 and concentrate on bread and butter issues like health care,
real jobs to replace those lost to technology and cheap overseas labor and tax
relief for other than the wealthy.
* * *
* * *
As for the question of impeachment, right
now, many Democrats feel that there is enough in the Mueller Report, despite
its redactions, to establish a pathway to impeachment of the President. Although I have endorsed impeachment in the past, I now disagree. There is no doubt that the Democratic
majority in the House of Representatives can pass Articles of Impeachment, but
it is very doubtful that the two-thirds vote needed to convict in the Senate
can be reached. Remember, the
Republicans nominated and have, by and large, stood by “Cheatin’ Donald.”
Failure to convict in the Senate will only
give the Republicans an opportunity to scream out to America that the true
“facts’ are those broadcast daily on Fox News and the New York Times, the Washington
Post, CNN and MSNBC just represent “fake news.” (In 1998, failure by the Senate to convict Bill Clinton of the House-passed Articles of Impeachment served to strengthen his position among the population.)
So long as Republican Senators are beholden
to “Cheatin’ Donald” to avoid primary challenges from the right, and insure
the support of his base on Election Day, the issue of impeachment should be
avoided by Democrats. Remember, many an
election has been lost in this country by candidates who overestimated the
intelligence of the American people. So
it goes with impeachment.
The issues laid out above along with the grim shadow the Mueller Report sheds on the President are sufficient to get him out of office in 2020. Impeachment is too great a risk to take. Its likely defeat in the Senate would hand the Republicans a potent weapon.
JL
Looking Forward to 2020
And
speaking of that election, the major 2020 strategy of “Cheatin’ Donald” and his
dutiful Republican followers includes three specific tactics at this point:
Look for more of this |
(1)
continued emphasis on the danger to the nation’s security and economy posed by
immigrants being allowed to try to enter the United States under the guise of
seeking asylum under our existing laws,
(2)
trying to sow dissention in the Democratic Party, specifically by questioning
the patriotism of progressive Democrats, particularly those with Muslim
backgrounds, and by reducing the traditional support of Jews for that party by unrealistic
endorsement of anything Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu does, and
(3)
continued attacking of the press and media which he had specifically accused of
being an “enemy of the people.” "Cheatin' Donald," of course, excludes Fox News from this label.
To
blunt these tactics, and defeat the strategy of “Cheatin’ Donald,” the
Democrats have one weapon. That is the
“truth.” Truth is an absolute, not a
relative thing. Failing to recognize it
as such results in events such as the current spread of measles among the
unvaccinated, who chose to believe in internet-spread fictions rather than
scientifically proven truths.
There may be many “truths” in religion, for example, where different people may have varying beliefs in the nature of the Deity, or even denying that one exists, but that is a matter of faith, which takes over when truth is unprovable. But this does not extend to politics where "truths" cannot be as ambivalent as they are in matters of faith. “Cheatin’ Donald’s” strategy also includes the tactic of undermining truth by confusing it with “alternate facts.” (Donald, the world is not flat, although there may be a significant number of its inhabitants who believe it is. Some of them will also contract measles.)
There may be many “truths” in religion, for example, where different people may have varying beliefs in the nature of the Deity, or even denying that one exists, but that is a matter of faith, which takes over when truth is unprovable. But this does not extend to politics where "truths" cannot be as ambivalent as they are in matters of faith. “Cheatin’ Donald’s” strategy also includes the tactic of undermining truth by confusing it with “alternate facts.” (Donald, the world is not flat, although there may be a significant number of its inhabitants who believe it is. Some of them will also contract measles.)
All
the more, this emphasizes the need for Democrats to concentrate their efforts
on bread and butter issues, as described in the article directly above this
one, rather than on "Cheatin' Donald." Attacking him is like punching a pillow.
JL
Survival
of our Planet – Survival of Democracy
Now
let’s get serious … and in fact, frighteningly so.
Planet Earth has been around for a very long time. And it has been hospitable to life forms for
only a tiny portion of that time. Its environment has changed many times over
uncountable revolutions around the sun. It took a very, very, very long time
for a single cell life form such as an amoeba to appear, for plant
and animal species to evolve, develop, flourish, and usually become
extinct for a variety of reasons such as climate changes, cataclysmic disasters
and natural predators. Animal life in
the form of man, homo sapiens, has dominated Planet Earth for only an
infinitesimally minute portion of the tiny portion of its history during which
any form of life whatsoever has been present.
We live here as tenants. We do not own the place. |
All
that mankind has created over that very brief period, our literature, music,
art, philosophy, history, technology and even our belief in a “divine” power, is
miniscule and insignificant when viewed in the context of the apparently
limitless universe where time and space merge and of which “our” planet is but a
part. It would be presumptuous to assume
that our presence here and our dominance over the planet will last
forever. The dinosaurs were around for
longer than mankind has been here, and they are long gone. Someday, we will be too. We might be subject
to a planet-wide flood or fire, be struck by a giant asteroid, we may lose the
ability to feed ourselves or we may blow ourselves up. Don’t kid yourself. Homo sapiens is not the ultimate species. (Some say ants might be.)
Nevertheless,
it would be wise for those inhabiting our planet to take steps to guarantee the
human race’s survival for as long as possible. To survive another ten thousand centuries, a mere droplet in the history of Planet Earth, would be
great! (That would be about 40,000
generations.) It probably will be much less.
Unfortunately,
the steps necessary for such survival cannot be taken by a planet which is
infatuated with the very, very recent and glorious idea of democracy! With survival on the line, we cannot afford
the luxury of preserving individual rights and making decisions after logical
debate by thinking individuals. Democracy, while satisfying to the soul, is not
well suited for taking the kinds of actions, possibly very unpleasant and
costly ones, needed to prolong the survival of the human race.
To
accomplish that, we will need to evolve politically into having one all-powerful
technological authority in control of the entire planet, making all the rules,
decisions, and taking the steps necessary to continue the efforts necessary to
extend the existence and control of our planet by the human race for as long as
possible. The tool to accomplish this might take the form of some kind of artificial intelligence. Doesn’t sound nice, but that’s
the way it is going to be over the next few thousand years. Whatever happens, the ants, or someone or
something, will be waiting to take over.
The
following time line is approximate, but it should make it clear that we are
merely the most recent tenants of this planet.
__1_______________________2________________________________________________________________________3__4_5.
1. Creation of Planet Earth – 4.5 Billion
Years ago
2. First Appearance of living cells on Earth
– 3.5 Billion Years ago
3. First Appearance of Dinosaurs on Earth –
230 Million years ago
4. First Appearance of early Human-like
Creatures – 66 Million years ago
5. End of Stone Age – 15,000 years ago,
Beginning of recorded history – 5,000 years ago.
JL
A Great Kathleen Parker Column
Parker |
Tragic File at Notre Dame |
Last week Kathleen Parker wrote in the Washington
Post about the President of the United States and the tragic fire which
destroyed most of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. If you missed this terrific column, CLICK HERE to read it.
(It is often difficult to set up links to
Washington Post columns … they want you to subscribe … but it is indeed possible to
access their columns when they are reprinted in other papers, as we’ve done here. The same thing goes for the New York Times. As for reproducing the columns in their
entirety on the blog, I have been advised by someone at the Palm Beach Post that doing so is
actually illegal, and to use links where possible instead, so that is what I do.)
JL
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO
FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email
every time a new posting appears. If you wish to be added to that
Email list, just let me know by sending me an email at Riart1@aol.com.
HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACKSPOTPOURRI.com
Contact me by email at Riart1@aol.com. YOU ALSO
CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR
COMMENTS AT THAT ADDRESS. (Comments can also be made by clicking on the
"Post a Comment" link at the blog's end, though few followers of the
blog have done that lately.)
MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO
AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?
HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the
appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right or
scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this
posting. The “Search Box” in the right side of
the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are
looking. THESE FEATURES, ALONG WITH OTHER VALUABLE “SIDEBAR” ITEMS, INCLUDING
ADVERTISEMENTS, MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE ON ALL MOBILE DEVICES. CHECK THEM OUT ON YOUR DESKTOP OR LAPTOP
COMPUTERS.
HOW TO FORWARD
POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for
that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the
envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below,
enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.
You might also want to let me know their Email
address so that they may be alerted to future postings.
No comments:
Post a Comment