I
apologize. I thought I would be able to
continue this blog WITHOUT including items of political interest. I suppose I could but that would be like
cooking without salt, pepper, cilantro, paprika, oregano, basil, curry, red
wine vinegar or extra virgin olive oil … not to speak of true-down-home
southern barbecue sauce. So, this
posting resumes the presence of politics on Jackspotpourri.com.
I
got started doing this with a few friends back in 1964, when Lyndon Johnson was
running for President against Barry Goldwater.
We devised a bumper sticker reading “Goldwater in 1864,” implying that the Republican candidate was a century
behind the times. We called our
operation “Politicklers,” and actually sold about a dozen stickers, after
running an ad in the Village Voice. Occasionally, I’ve used “Politicklers” as
a heading on this blog, and that’s what I’ll be doing in today’s posting.
Politicklers
Is This the
Plan? - It’s
clear that the new Attorney General will reserve the right to keep portions of
the Mueller report, when it comes out, from being available to the public. I suspect that the only content which might
result in his doing that would
involve either national security or information
involving the President of the United States, the release of which might
initiate an unprecedented Constitutional crisis. When confidentially
presented with this possibility, the President might choose to resign,
ostensibly for health reasons, in exchange for a pledge that the information be
kept permanently from the public, and the Congress not act upon it. Should he not though, the ultimate
result of the release of that information, either officially or through
“leakage,” could have unpredictable and heretofore unimaginable results.
Mueller |
Buzzfeed Scoop (?) - Last
week, online news site Buzzfeed reported that former
Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s allegation that DJT asked him to lie before investigators regarding his Russian business connections was supported by other evidence Special Prosecutor Mueller’s team had developed. The Mueller team was quick to break precedent and deny that as inaccurate. Why? My gut guess is that Buzzfeed’s informants, probably not part of Mueller’s tight-lipped team, revealed that information without knowing the extent to which the Special Prosecutor had it “nailed down” and Mueller’s people felt its premature release would somehow hamper their efforts to present unchallengeable information in their final report.
Edukayshinal
Kredenshils - Although
I am a retired senior citizen, I still well remember those years when I was
still in school. I remember much of what
I learned at Peshine Avenue School and at Weequahic High School back in Newark
and at Rutgers University as well as from assorted other educational experiences
I have had. I remember some of the
teachers, instructors and professors as well as a good chunk, I hope, of
whatever it was they were trying get me to learn. I think, to a lesser or greater extent, most
seniors can recall the same things.
Fordham University |
This causes me to wonder if Donald J. Trump ever actually
attended the New York Military Academy, Fordham University, the University of
Pennsylvania and its Wharton School, or whether a paid “stand-in” showed up in
classes and took exams for him at these otherwise reputable institutions. No one with this kind of supposed educational background can
possibly display the gross ignorance the President exhibits almost daily. When
asked during the 2016 campaign what books he had read, he replied, “All Quiet
on the Western Front.” Conceivably, that
might have been a reading assignment he remembered from the military academy he
supposedly attended, but I wonder if he even knows its author’s name. Along the way, should he not have been
exposed to required Literature, History and Foreign Language courses at these
schools?
Frankly, I doubt that the President has more than an elementary
school education. The other day, in denying the almost daily suspicions
voiced that he was illicitly involved with Russia, he said such a claim
was “a big fat lie.” Saying that something is a “big fat anything”
comes right out of any elementary school schoolyard. It is not something
adults say. Ten yearolds use such language. Someday, someone will investigate whether his
family made generous donations to the institutions Trump is said to have
attended and whether he ever
actually showed up there in person.
Adjective vs
Noun – The
presence of an adjective explains or describes a noun’s qualities. A noun
itself, without such a modifier, stands alone, even if another noun is tacked
onto it instead of an adjective. When
that happens, its meaning is determined by whatever pre-judgements
(prejudices?) whomever is using the expanded pair of nouns may have. If those prejudices are negative ones, they
define both nouns negatively for listeners.
Example: While someone may not be
bigoted when he states that he bought something from a Jewish businessman, that
certainly is not true when he says he bought it from a Jew businessman. See the difference? Get it?
That’s known as the pejorative use of a noun in place of an adjective.
Back
in 1948, perennial G.O.P. Presidential nominee Harold Stassen started referring
to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party, using the noun in a pejorative
sense as explained above. He took away
the benevolent sound of the adjective “democratic” leaving the opposing party’s
name defined only by the naked noun, “Democrat,” which lacked the expanded
meaning of the Party’s true name, which of course is the “Democratic Party.”
To this day, Republicans still do this, and most terrifyingly, its use has crept into use by journalists, particularly on radio and TV, even those favorably inclined toward Democrats. It even occasionally appears in the language of Democrats! I heard it used recently at a Democratic Party gathering by a high Democratic official. They should know better. Its use makes Republicans feel good, particularly when someone other than a Republican is using this kind of pejorative language.
The “Socialism” Myth - Many
Republican voters and Trump supporters believe right-wing liars (like *those found daily on Fox News) who point out that the
Democratic Party is leaning leftward toward such ideas as Single Payer Health
Care (Medicare for all?), free or reduced tuition at colleges and developing tax
strategies aimed at wealth redistribution, and that such steps are “socialism”
and to be condemned as such. They say they will lead to our country toward becoming
another “Venezuela.”
Baloney! Government at all levels does a lot of things
already (our armed forces, interstate highways, financial, environmental and
consumer regulation, agricultural subsidies, the Affordable Care Act, Social
Security, Medicare, small business assistance, public schools, police and fire
departments, parks, zoning laws, water and sewer facilities, drug and food
safety regulation, etc.) and these are not considered “socialism” except by
those extreme libertarians who want to privatize everything under the sun! (These buffoons usually claim to have read
Ayn Rand, but judging by the length and plodding wordiness of “Atlas Shrugged,”
I doubt that they have, even Senator Rand Paul, who is named after her.)
Socialism,
by definition, involves the nationalization of a nation’s means of
production and distribution of goods. Note carefully that none of
the areas listed above involve producing, manufacturing or distributing anything. Neither would more government participation
in progressive programs improving health care, education or tax relief for the
middle and bottom economic classes be “socialism.” Anyone who claims that it would be, is, in
the words of our President, “a big fat liar.”
*
(Hannity, Ingraham, Carlson, Pirro, etc.)
Jack Lippman
Free Chanel No. 5 Fragrance
A few years ago, when my son was living
with me for a while, he purchased two Ylang-Ylang tree seedlings and potted
them on our patio. After a year or so,
he transplanted one out behind our house and it is now about twenty feet
tall. Last year, I had the remaining one
moved to the front of the house where it now reaches up about twelve feet.
In 1921, Coco Chanel introduced what is
probably the world’s most famous perfume, Chanel No. 5. Its unmistakable aroma is derived from roses,
jasmine and the blossoms of the Ylang Ylang tree, which seems to be the
catalyst in its fragrance.
Ylang Ylang blossom |
Both of my Ylang Ylang trees are now in
blossom (they bloom intermittently throughout the year) and those who know
where I live are welcome to come and reach for a blossom, gently remove it,
sniff it and rub it behind their ears.
For all intents and purposes, this will accomplish the same results as
Chanel No. 5, for which a 3.4 oz. spray bottle of ‘eau de parfum’ is currently
priced at $172. But watch for the bees.
JL
IF
This poem by Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936) was published in 1910. Many of us were exposed to it back in high school. Kipling wrote it for his son, but it still rings true today for us.
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or, being hated, don’t give way to hating,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise;
If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;
If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with triumph and disaster
And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to broken,
And stoop and build ‘em up with wornout tools;
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you
Except the Will which says to them: “Hold on”;
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings—nor lose the common touch;
If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you;
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unforgiving minute
With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run—
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!
JL
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email
every time a new posting appears. If you wish to be added to that
Email list, just let me know by sending me an email at Riart1@aol.com.
HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACKSPOTPOURRI.com
Contact me by email at Riart1@aol.com. YOU ALSO
CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR
COMMENTS AT THAT ADDRESS. (Comments can also be made by clicking on the
"Post a Comment" link at the blog's end, though few followers of the
blog have done that lately.)
MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO
AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?
HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the
appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right or
scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this
posting. The “Search Box” in the right side of
the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are
looking. THESE FEATURES, ALONG WITH OTHER VALUABLE “SIDEBAR” ITEMS, INCLUDING
ADVERTISEMENTS, MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE ON ALL MOBILE DEVICES. CHECK THEM OUT ON YOUR DESKTOP OR LAPTOP
COMPUTERS.
HOW TO FORWARD
POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for
that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the
envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below,
enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.
You might also want to let me know their Email
address so that they may be alerted to future postings.
Jack Lippman
No comments:
Post a Comment