Amendments and Political Parties
Those that believe we should live by the words in the Constitution
approved back in 1789 tend to forget that that document provided for change
through Amendments. Those who wrote the
Constitution knew there would be need for changes in the future. The requirements were rigorous, but through
the years several Amendments have passed which have had a significant effect on
elections. Here is a brief summary of
Amendments to the Constitution which have affected election results.
12th Amendment (1804) – Clarified how Electoral College
Selected the President and Vice President. (a majority of electoral votes needed
for each office; otherwise decision to be resolved in House for the Presidency
… one vote per state … and in the Senate for Vice President). Before that, the Vice-President was the one
who came in second after the Presidential winner, resulting in Presidents and
Vice-Presidents who disagreed with each other. Example: President John Adams barely spoke to Thomas Jefferson, his Vice-President.
15th Amendment (1870) – Gave former slaves right to vote.
17th Amendment (1913) – Senators popularly elected rather
than selected by State legislatures.
19th Amendment (1920) – Gave women the right to vote.
26th Amendment (1971) – Lowered voting age to 18.
Although George Washington did not want to see political parties
develop in the United States, preventing them forever was impossible. In the early years of the country, the
Electoral College voted on candidates as individuals, who were not identified
as members of a political party, because at that time, there were no official
parties. But here's how they eventually came to be.
Washington and Adams believed in a strong central government and were
identified as “Federalists,” which was a philosophy rather than a party. Their successors (Jefferson, Madison and
Monroe) considered themselves “Democratic Republicans” and preferred a weaker
central government and greater states’ rights.
John Quincy Adams, a “Federalist,” became President in 1824 in an
election decided in the House when none of the candidates received a majority of the Electoral College as required by the 12th Amendment, after
significant bargaining with the “Democratic Republican" candidates, to the
disadvantage of the popular choice, Andrew Jackson. By this time, the Electoral
College was elected popularly in most States whereas in earlier days, it was
appointed by State legislatures. This
made quite a difference, particularly to a candidate like Jackson who appealed to the working men and farmers with mud on their boots..
Andrew Jackson
A bitter Andrew Jackson and his supporters then broke off from the
“Democratic Republicans” and began calling themselves simply “Democrats,” a proudly perjorative term at the time, starting the
party we still know today by that name. They
came back to win the Presidency for three straight elections, using tough
campaign techniques recognizable today, far less scrupulous and polite than
those of their less organized opponents who still followed the gentlemanly
rules of Jefferson, Madison and Monroe.
The remaining “Democratic Republicans” called themselves “National
Republicans” and banded together with along with other opponents of Andrew Jackson. These groups had many different agendas
(pro-slavery, anti-slavery, states’ rights, abolitionists, congressional
supremacy, high tariffs, no tariffs, a central bank, no central bank, internal
improvements), hatred of “King” Andrew Jackson being the glue that held them
together. They called themselves Whigs,
after a party in England who fought the King's having political power. Behind all of this was the two-ton gorilla in
the room that no one wanted to deal with: what would be the rules for the expansion of slavery as the country grew?
Although never elected President, Henry Clay was the heart of the Whig Party
The Whigs were the first party to hold a convention, as we know it
today. The only Presidents they elected,
William Henry Harrison (1840) and Zachary Taylor (1848) died in office. The Whigs broke up, their states’ right
pro-slavery wing eventually joining with the Democrats who were swinging away
from support of a Jackson-style strong executive branch to a states’ rights
orientation.
What was left of the Whigs formed the basis for the present Republican
Party which first ran a Presidential candidate in 1856. They became the party of a strong executive
branch and a strong central government, no longer willing to
compromise about slavery and states’ rights under
Lincoln, Grant and their successors while the Democrats became states’ rights advocates after the Civil War. This orientation existed until it was reversed during
the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson (1912)
when the Democrats became the party of a strong central government, which is where its stands today, with the Republicans standing more for reserving more power to the states and less to the Federal government. This 20th Century shift in roles of our two major parties resulted in states' rights supporters, particularly in the South, abandoning their Democratic affiliations and becoming Republicans.
compromise about slavery and states’ rights under
Lincoln, Grant and their successors while the Democrats became states’ rights advocates after the Civil War. This orientation existed until it was reversed during
the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson (1912)
when the Democrats became the party of a strong central government, which is where its stands today, with the Republicans standing more for reserving more power to the states and less to the Federal government. This 20th Century shift in roles of our two major parties resulted in states' rights supporters, particularly in the South, abandoning their Democratic affiliations and becoming Republicans.
Please forgive the broad and possibly erroneous generalizations which
this highly oversimplified history lesson includes, but it is the backdrop for
the very violent Presidential campaign upon which we are embarking, comparable
to what happened in 1824, 1828 and in 1840 when an observer commented that the
best way to lose an election was to concentrate on issues.
JL
The Education of Donald Trump
For those who weren't aware of it, Mr. Trump first attended a private school in
Queens, NY, but completed his secondary education at New York Military Academy.
Trump at N.Y.M.A., the only time he wore a uniform
His higher education continued at Fordham University in the Bronx for two years after which he transferred to the University of Pennsylvania where his older brother had matriculated. He majored in business there and while he certainly benefited from the courses provided by the University’s Wharton School of Business to the University’s undergraduate business majors, he did not participate in the Wharton’s School’s prestigious graduate programs. After graduation, he went into his family’s business. Information as to where he stood in his class was not available to researchers, although Mr. Trump has claimed he graduated first in his class.
Trump at N.Y.M.A., the only time he wore a uniform
His higher education continued at Fordham University in the Bronx for two years after which he transferred to the University of Pennsylvania where his older brother had matriculated. He majored in business there and while he certainly benefited from the courses provided by the University’s Wharton School of Business to the University’s undergraduate business majors, he did not participate in the Wharton’s School’s prestigious graduate programs. After graduation, he went into his family’s business. Information as to where he stood in his class was not available to researchers, although Mr. Trump has claimed he graduated first in his class.
JL
I Am Waiting for the Day
Those of you who listen to National Public Radio might appreciate
this. Those who don’t, just skip
it.
Frequently, at the conclusion of an interview on an NPR program when the
host wraps it up by thanking the guest for being there for the interview, the
interviewee usually responds with the words, “Thank you for having me.” It must be on a card they give to them. They always say that.
I always chuckle when I hear that because I am waiting for the day when a prostitute is
interviewed on an NPR program and responds to the interviewer in that manner.
JL
What the Next President (and maybe you too) Should Know About the Middle East
What the Next President (and maybe you too) Should Know About the Middle East
The next President of the United States will have to deal with the Middle East, an area which has vexed the past two administrations. But other than Hillary Clinton, what do the other candidates know about the Middle East? What do you know about the Middle East?
Let’s look at it. What have we there? Well, there are some “real” countries there,
nations that promise to be able to continue to stand on their own two feet
permanently and have thus far managed to survive. These include Egypt, Turkey and Iran. We should try to be friendly with the first two. Someday, with a growth in trust, real friendship with Iran might also be possible.
Look in the history books. Give these three countries credit for having been around quite a while. Israel, also fits into this category. Syria and Lebanon might also belong with
them if they ever become capable of controlling their own destinies,
which for many centuries, they have not.
But what about the rest of the Middle East? What about Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen
and those rich little places around the Persian Gulf like Bahrein, Abu Dhabi, Qatar or
Kuwait? Are they really countries? Most
of their borders are artificial, drawn by Europeans after the centuries-old
Ottoman Empire collapsed. Without the
oil underneath them, would they even exist?
Are their governments really anything more, as it has been said,
than tribes with a flag? The terrorist
Islamic State is an attempt to violently join these places into one united Sunni Islamic theocracy
(a caliphate, they call it), getting rid of the countries now occupying this sandy waste. They even hope to extend their “realm” to
places outside of the Middle East like Somalia and Libya which present the same kinds of
opportunities.
I mentioned Iran as a more
permanent nation. They too are a
theocracy, a Shia nation, but somewhat more open to ideas than the Sunni Islamic
State. They are militaristic and try to influence and
ultimately absorb other contiguous Shia-populated areas currently found in parts of Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.
The history of the Middle East over the next
century will be a consolidation of these two groups into two nations, divided
along sectarian lines, one Sunni and one Shia. This will not
happen peacefully. Peripherally involved
in this is nearby Russia just to the north, into which some of this Islamic sectarian nationalism
creeps. They are interested in keeping
it beyond their borders. Right now, they
are siding more or less with the Iranians.
The United States, and Israel to some extent, attempt to work with
those Sunni countries opposed to the Islamic State. This is a viable position but only so long as
their oil reserves exist, without which they would disappear off of the map.
It gets more complicated. Sunni Pakistan, to the east of Shia
Iran, was part of India until that country split into two, dividing itself into
Islamic and Hindu dominated nations. Unconquerable Afghanistan is tucked in between Pakistan
and Russia.
In that part of the world, politics and religion are inseparable,
as are nationalism and sectarianism. I hope all of the Presidential candidates understand this and recognize that it was not all caused by George Bush or Barack Obama. It's just the way the Middle East is.
JL
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
JL
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email
every time a new posting appears. If you wish to be added to that
Email list, just let me know by clicking on Riart1@aol.com and sending me an
Email.
HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACK'S
POTPOURRI.
BY CLICKING ON THAT SAME ADDRESS, Riart1@aol.com YOU ALSO
CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR
COMMENTS. (Comments can also be made by clicking on the "Post a
Comment" link at the blog's end.)
MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO
AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?
HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the
appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right,
or scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very
bottom of this posting. The “Search Box” in the
right side of the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for
which you are looking.
HOW TO FORWARD
POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for
that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the
envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below,
enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.
You might also want to let me know their Email
address so that they may be alerted to future postings.
Jack Lippman
No comments:
Post a Comment