About Me

My photo
BOYNTON BEACH, FL, United States
Jack is a graduate of Rutgers University where he majored in history. His career in the life and health insurance industry involved medical risk selection and brokerage management. Retired in Florida since 2001 after many years in NJ and NY, widowed since 2010, he occasionally writes and paints, participates in play readings and is catching up on Shakespeare, Melville and Joyce, etc.

Monday, August 22, 2022

08-21- 022 - Charles Blow's Column Expounded Upon, America's Problem, Republican 'Crazies' and Democracy Unmasked

 

Republicans are America’s Problem

Here’s a quote from Charles Blow’s New York Times column of August 17 about the manner in which many liberals and progressives think of Republicans

We have to stop saying that all these people are duped and led astray, that they are somehow under the spell of Trump and programmed by Fox News. Propaganda and disinformation are real and insidious, but I believe that to a large degree, Republicans’ radicalization is willful. Republicans have searched for multiple election cycles for the right vehicle and packaging for their white nationalism, religious nationalism, nativism, craven capitalism and sexism.’ 

Please take special note of the underlined portions of the above excerpt.

Blow is correct in that there has always been dissent, often undemocratic, in this country and it always has sought to find a platform for its ideas, which would be unpalatable on their own.

Those Who Opposed Democracy in 1776
 Conveniently Just Said They Were
Being Loyal to the king.
Back in 1776, there were ‘Tories’ who sided with the British monarchy.  Even before the birth of the Republican Party in the 1850s, nativist dissenters joined under the label of ‘know nothings.’  After the Civil War, those opposed to democracy joined the opposition to ‘Reconstruction’ by supporting ‘the Lost Cause,’ states’ rights, and most violently, the Ku Klux Klan. In the twentienth century, they jumped on the ‘eugenics’ bandwagon and bought into any group that was against immigration, including labor unions which otherwise they attacked. Fighting communism was another of their vehicles, even when it meant endorsing pseudo-patriotic charlatans such as Senator Joseph McCarthy, as well as pushing ‘America Firsters’ ideas. They are not above tying their aims to Jesus Christ, who is difficult, if not sacrilegious for many to criticize.

These were the vehicles those in favor of white and religious nationalism, nativism, craven capitalism, and sexism used to package their ideas.

But now, and this is the point Blow makes in the title of his column, their search for wagons on which to hitch their anti-democratic ideas has ended.

They now have achieved their own legitimacy by taking ownership of the Republican Party, which has totally abandoned the ideas of Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower (they called him a communist) and to some extent, even of Ronald Reagan.  CLICK HERE to read or re-read the column, which you also can find at https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/17/opinion/republicans-cheney-trump-democracy.html.  Note that its title is ‘Republicans are America’s Problem.’

‘America’s Problem’ in other times used to be British colonialism, slavery, fascism, or communism, concurrently or separately. But by now, it is clear that Republicans have replaced them as the ‘problem,’ using the dishonest salesmanship of the forty-fifth president as their pathway to getting there. Anti-democratic forces no longer need someone else’s wagon on which to hitch their ideas. They have become the wagon! They have achieved their own legitimacy by seizing the name of a restructured Republican Party.

That legitimacy is not unlike the legitimacy the fascists finally achieved in Germany in 1932 as ‘National Socialists’ and that which the Bolsheviks achieved in Russia in 1918, where minorities managed to defeat less authoritarian alternatives.  And it appears to me reasonable to conclude that those still calling themselves Republicans are ‘comfortable’ with that, no longer having to hitch a ride on someone else’s wagon.

I call them ‘comfortable’ because in historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.’s 2003 ‘The Crisis of the Old Order,’ the author addresses the choice America had to make during the 1930s, that of ‘saving itself,’ or like Italy or Germany, seek ‘comfort’ in totalitarianism.  I mention this because it appears to me that many Republicans today are willing to sacrifice liberties for precisely that kind of ‘comfort’ in an autocracy that will quickly squelch dissent and reduce freedoms. They prefer that to the more elusive qualities that ‘make America great,’ words to which they constantly refer but do not understand.

History does not sleep soundly.  It does not take very much to awaken it from its dreams and nightmares.  Indeed, America did save itself during the 1930s led by Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the impetus of the Second World War.  Those reading Charles Blow’s column should work hard and long to do that right now, today, voting to enable America to again ‘save itself.’  We must solve what he identifies as ‘America’s Problem.’  Election Day draws near. Never before have the choices been so clearly delineated. 

VOTE!

JL                        

 

                                           *   *   *   *

         To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?

                                           *   *   *   *

 

Disillusionment Over American Democracy

Those of you who still think we live in the greatest democracy in the world (albeit a representative, republican, one) will learn a lot from reading this lengthy article from a recent New Yorker Magazine issue. Louis Menand, its writer, is a Pulitzer Prize winning author, a college professor, and regular contributor to that magazine.  His words may disillusion you.  

The article may be found at https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/08/22/american-democracy-was-never-designed-to-be-democratic-eric-holder-our-unfinished-march-nick-seabrook-one-person-one-vote-jacob-grumbach-laboratories-against-democracy or simply by CLICKING HERE.

If you have trouble accessing it, email me and I will help you.  The article is a bit too long to include in its entirety and summarizing it would be nearly impossible.  Budget at least half an hour to read and understand it, but please read it.  

It will explain to you how the vast majority of Americans, probably including you, have been politically, as well as royally, screwed, without their being aware of it for many, many years.

JL                        

 

                                           *   *   *   *

         To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?

                                           *   *   *   *

 

 

When Republicans Nominate ‘Crazies’ and a big ‘BUT’

Democratic Senate, House, Governorship, and state Legislature candidates should not base optimism on the number of Republican ‘crazies’ against whom they will be running on November 8.  Republicans erroneously believe that arguments that worked in their primaries in which proponents of the ‘big lie,’ and of even grosser fallacies, triumphed over less radical Republicans will also work in the election against Democrats and independent voters.  From a ‘numbers’ standpoint, It won’t.

BUT Democrats still should not overestimate the intelligence of the American voters, an attitude which has cost them dearly in the past. 

The more local (and smaller) the electorate for a particular office is, the more likely such overestimation of the voters’ understanding of issues will hurt Democrats. That’s why Republicans poll such big numbers in electing state legislatures and smaller numbers in presidential elections from a popular vote standpoint, where the Republicans’ only salvation is their control over election laws that domination of state legislatures gives them and the 'thumb on the scale' measures built into the Constitution.  

It also matters that when a vote is cast for a Republican candidate for village councilman, for example, the voter usually sticks with the G.O.P. for the other races, contests of far greater import, filling vacancies in Congress and governors' mansions.

Our representative democracy is not really that democratic unless the turnout for elections is truly GIGANTIC and MASSIVE from bottom to top of the ticket. Only you can make that happen!  (Refer to the item directly above in this posting.  Go back and read what Louis Menand has to say!)  

When I mention the voters’ understanding of issues, as I’ve just done, it implies a lack of intelligence on the part of some voters.  Ideally, it would be wonderful if only ‘intelligent’ people voted.  The testing needed to determine that, however, is totally undemocratic and would be like the methods used in Southern states to keep Blacks from voting during the Jim Crow eraIt should never be instituted.  

Implicit in democracy is the concept that the ignorant, the gullible, and the stupid (except perhaps those institutionalized) all have the right to vote because judging these qualities is purely subjective. One person’s screwball might be another’s genius.  That is the way it should be.  That’s the democratic way, even in representative democracy.

If one were to imagine, however, and it should never go beyond that theoretical stage as a mental exercise, that such intelligence testing, even on a totally non-political basis, for voting did indeed exist, I would suspect that those who vote for Republicans would be hurt the most.  The success of Democrats in ‘college towns’ in otherwise solid Republican states supports that theoretical result in such a purely imginative exercise.  Just a thought.

JL                         

 

                                           *   *   *   *

         To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?

                                           *   *   *   *

                      

 

America Afloat 

 


(A poem that is always worth repeating in these blog postings.                      

To learn more, visit this blog’s posting of July 30, 2022.) JL

 

 

 


America Afloat

 

Jack Lippman

 

The greatness of America

Is that it does survive

Attacks upon democracy

Whose flame it keeps alive.

 

The laws that blossom from the words

The Founding Fathers wrote

Still serve us well today to keep

America afloat.

 

This doesn’t happen by itself,

We cannot wish it true,

The bottom line, my friends, is that

It all depends on you.

 

 JL                        

 

                                           *   *   *   *

     To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?

 

                         That’s Not Enough!

Thursday, August 18, 2022

08-18-2022 - Lessons from Nursery School, Recovering Missing Documents, Liz's Choices, Flatulence and the Dylan-Lincoln Connection


                                      *   *   *   *

Toddlers Can’t Vote but You Can

Some toddlers, playing with blocks, try to stack them up.  Others try to knock down the stacks.  The first kind grow up to be Democrats.  The second kind grow up to be Republicans. Read on!



Under the leadership of President Biden’s administration, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,  …

  • Enabled Democrats in Congress to cap out-of-pocket prescription costs for seniors on Medicare at $2,000 while Republicans recommend that they take out loans to pay for them, if they can, or just go broke.
  • Enabled Democrats in Congress to continue some benefit provisions in the Affordable Care Act enacted to deal with the Coronavirus pandemic that Republicans were willing to let expire.
  • Enabled Democrats in Congress to finally appropriate billions over future years to regulate environmental hazards which result in climate change while Republicans still believe that the tooth fairy will stop temperatures from increasing, forests from burning, and sea levels from rising.
  • Enabled Democrats in Congress to pass a minimum 15% tax on corporate profits to help pay for these things for the American people, while Republicans still try to provide loopholes to enable some businesses to pay no taxes at all. 

This should make it very clear that Democrats are on the side of the people and Republican loyalties are directed elsewhere and this should help determine the way you vote

Both kinds of toddlers learned to be that way in nursery school!  (Are Republicans reluctant to support helping finance such Pre-K programs because toddlers might learn something there?)

Toddlers are too young to vote, but you are not.  Make sure that the slim Democratic majorities in the House and the Senate are not only maintained but increased. 

The next Congress will likely address (1) whether judges or politicians can interfere with personal decisions made between patients and their doctors, and (2) whether politically motivated state legislatures can limit voters’ rights by gerrymandering and election procedural changes, issues vital to two voting groups: women and persons of color, as well as (3) the never-ending problem of gun violence about which Republicans are too deaf to hear the shots going off.

These issues directly involve the way our Constitution is interpreted and affect the checks and balances the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches of our government provide in relation to one another.  They are very important to the future of democracy in the United States.

Election Day is less than twelve weeks away. You must not only vote, but also encourage as many others as possible to register and vote.  When the votes are tabulated, your one vote can be doubled or tripled (or more) by virtue of those your efforts brought to the polls.  

Get to work.  Forward this blog, knock on doors, make phone calls, send emails!   It’s your job!

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

Echoes of the FBI’s Recovery of Our Government’s

Documents from Mar-a-Lago

The Republicans are attempting to put the DOJ, specifically in the person of the Attorney General, in the position of defending itself for carrying out its duties.

Usually, it is the other way around, where the accused (and right now no one has been accused of anything and will not be unless and until a grand jury acts) who must offer a defense. I've never heard of prosecutors having to start off by defending themselves for doing their jobs.  In this case, the job was defined by a court order signed by a federal judge who agreed that there was sufficient ‘probable cause’ for a search for such missing government documents.

And the same applies to DOJ investigators like the FBI agents who were also just doing their jobs.

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

 

Liz’s Choices

Now that the Republicans have exchanged Liz Chaney for just another blind supporter of the defeated former president, she is free to go in a number of directions, and this will provide meat for columnists and pundits over the next months.  I would hope such digressions do not take their eyes off of the ball, which is the preservation of the Constitution and democracy in the united (?) United States (that is not a typo). 

Ms. Chaney might:

… become a Democrat (very unlikely)

… work for reform within the Republican Party, espousing opposition to both Democratic socio-economic reforms and bigoted extremism in the ranks of Republicans and other conservatives.

… start a new party, espousing opposition to both Democratic socio-economic reforms and bigoted extremism in the ranks of Republicans and other conservatives.

…  write a book (likely).

…  move to another state and run for office, including the presidency in 2024 or 2028, seeking the Republican nomination, or another pathway to the White House.

… assume the role of a retired statesperson and encourage others to emulate her, perhaps from the position of a college presidency or a foundation.

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

 

Blame it on the Dog

I really don't have any Party affiliation

There’s an old story about a host, who when experiencing an episode of flatulence at a gathering would grin and say ‘Oh, darn that dog, he has no manners,’ and everyone would smile knowingly. Of course, they understood because they all did the same thing when they farted at home, blaming it on their dog, even when they didn’t even have one. This is a cute story until one realizes that it accurately describes the failure of the Republican Party and its leadership to accept accountability for its actions.


JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

 

 

Blowin’ in the Wind – Bob Dylan and Abraham Lincoln

In 2016, Bob Dylan was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature.  Some criticized that choice, but I leave it for you to decide.  Here are the words to his most famous song:

How many roads must a man walk down

Before you call him a man?

How many seas must a white dove sail

Before she sleeps in the sand?

Yes, and how many times must the cannonballs fly

Before they're forever banned?

The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind

The answer is blowin' in the wind

Yes, and how many years must a mountain exist

Before it is washed to the sea?

And how many years can some people exist

Before they're allowed to be free?

Yes, and how many times can a man turn his head

And pretend that he just doesn't see?

The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind

The answer is blowin' in the wind

Yes, and how many times must a man look up

Before he can see the sky?

And how many ears must one man have

Before he can hear people cry?

Yes, and how many deaths will it take 'til he knows

That too many people have died?

The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind

The answer is blowin' in the wind

 

Copyright © 1962 by Warner Bros. Inc.; renewed 1990 by Special Rider Music

 

These lyrics remind me of Abraham Lincoln asking in his first inaugural address on the eve of the Civil War when Americans would start listening for their ‘better angels.’  His words appealed to those same ‘better angels of our nature’ that Dylan sung of as answers that were ‘blowin’ in the wind.’ 

Lincoln’s words: The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battle-field, and patriot grave, to every living heart and hearthstone, all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.’ 

The Civil War was fought anyway, while the mystic chords of memory were not touched for four more years, during which time the ‘better angels’ were just ‘blowin’ in the wind.’

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

 

America Afloat 

 


 

(A poem that is always worth repeating in these blog postings.                      

To learn more, visit this blog’s posting of July 30, 2022.) JL

 

 

 

America Afloat 

Jack Lippman

The greatness of America

Is that it does survive

Attacks upon democracy

Whose flame it keeps alive.

 

The laws that blossom from the words

The Founding Fathers wrote

Still serve us well today to keep

America afloat.

 

This doesn’t happen by itself,

We cannot wish it true,

The bottom line, my friends, is that

It all depends on you.

 

 JL                        

 

                                           *   *   *   *

     To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?

 

                         That’s Not Enough!

 

 

 



Sunday, August 14, 2022

08-14-2022 - Election Reminder, Century-Old Words, Religious Thoughts, De-Briefings, Buying Your Leased Car

 

Words From the Past
White

The more things change, the more they stay the same.  About a hundred years ago, William Allen White, the editor of the Emporia (KS) Gazette, addressed the futility of trying to reach that period’s violence-prone white supremacist group, the resurrected Ku Klux Klan. He wrote that ‘no arguments you may use, no facts you may present, no logic you may array, will in the slightest affect these people … They have no capacity for receiving arguments, no minds for retaining or sifting facts, and no mental processes that will hold logic. If they had any of these, they would not be Kluxers.’ 

Just replace ‘Kluxers’ with the names of today’s right-wing extremist groups, starting with believers in QAnon, and you can see the progress we have made in a century is not so great as you might want to believe.

 JL                           

                                   *   *   *   *

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?     

                                   *   *   *   * 

On Religion

It is good to be somewhat observant of a religion, any religion, just so long as it does not advocate harming other human beings and fills your personal needs, leaving you feeling good.  But don’t get carried away by it.  It just might be enough to be awed by the first Chapter of Genesis, the allegorical description of the Creation, whatever version of it you choose to believe (even a scientific one), and not get any further involved.  If you do, you just might be looking for trouble.

But if you look further, at least try to recognize that everything else beyond the Creation story in any religion’s holy books is merely commentary by those who think more deeply than most about such things, which are there for you to take or leave.  On that level, you will find disagreements both between different religions and within religions themselves to be rampant, some of which even lead people to harm one another, which is not good.

Rushdie
The attempt on the life of author Salman Rushdie is an example of this. This act should bother Muslims who might consider a ‘fatwah’ imposed upon a Muslim to be merely symbolic, and not to be acted upon, especially if it suggests personal harm or even death.  Similarly, when Iranians take to the streets and join with religious cheerleaders in demanding ‘death’ to America or to Israel, is their message to be taken literally or figuratively?  Different listeners hear the message differently, and so it seems to be with a ‘fatwah’ imposed on Muslims as well. Some might, as with the attempt on Rushdie’s life, take it seriously as a religious duty.  I’m okay with religions speaking out against blasphemers or even excommunicating them but attempting to murder them is going too far. 

If Islam advocates harming or killing someone who commits a sacrilegious, but non-violent act, like writing a book filled with blasphemy (Rushdie’s crime), it had better have some very persuasive non-theological arguments to support its position.  (This is one strong argument against theocracies, where there is no non-theological alternative.) 

Otherwise, they risk being as guilty of murder as Christianity was for burning non-believers at the stake during the Inquisition, a bad thing, and the early Hebrews were of stoning to death those who violated some Biblical injunctions, another bad thing.  An extreme way of looking at it might be to ask if Adolf Hitler had not committed suicide, and been captured, tried, convicted, and executed, would it have been for writing ‘Mein Kampf’ or for carrying out that book’s ideas in the Holocaust?

Such behavior, endorsing taking a life because of one's beliefs or writings, however inflammatory, gives religion a very bad name, and gives atheists and agnostics cause to smile.  They may not believe in a ‘hell’ but they know who deserves to eventually end up there, if by chance there is such a place reserved for believers.

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

Who is Debriefed and Who Isn’t?

Anyone in government or the armed forces who has access to classified information, on leaving their position and no longer having 'the need to know,' is officially 'debriefed' or should be. 'Debriefing' includes their being made aware of the possible penalties (imprisonment and/or fines) for revealing, or even suggesting they once had access to, classified information. I wonder where, as one proceeds up the hierarchy, 'debriefing' is not carried out.  Are former presidents, cabinet members, members of Congress, generals, etc., ever 'debriefed'?  On what rung of the ladder does the necessity for 'debriefing' start to no longer apply?

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

Election Reminder

Just about a dozen weeks remain until Election Day.  Without going into details, this will possibly be the final opportunity for Americans to challenge those who are intent on replacing our democratic republic with an autocracy.

The once honorable Republican Party has been taken over by those who cannot distinguish between conservatism and fascism. No Republican, at any level, who accepts the lies of the defeated former president, should receive the vote of loyal Americans.  

Voting for State legislatures is now of more importance than ever before.  Letting Republicans control them only serves to spread their political cancer.  Look how they attempt to undermine the electoral college and take away voters' rights to fair representation through gerrymandering.  

What can you do about it?  Vote! And devote some time to urging friends and relatives to register and vote.  Get involved politically.  (In Florida, registered Democrats will choose between Nikki Fried and Charlie Crist in an August 23 primary to oppose the dreadful Ron DeSantis now sitting in the Governor's chair. Either one would be preferable to him.  Also, Val Demings deserves the support of all interested in replacing the worthless Marco Rubio in the Senate.)

JL

                                *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   *

 

On Purchasing a Leased Car When Lease Ends

A few years ago I leased a car from a local dealership.  I liked it so much that at the end of the lease I decided to purchase the car, according to the terms of the lease agreement.  I contacted the financer of my lease, a banking subsidiary of the car’s manufacturer and was told that since they did not have a Florida car dealer’s license, according to that state’s peculiar laws, they couldn’t sell me the car and I had to purchase it through a local dealership which would go through the paperwork charade of obtaining the car’s title  from the finance company, and then resell it to me under the terms of the lease. 

So I contacted the dealership where I had leased the car three years earlier and to my amazement, even though they would never even see the car, the dealership tacked a ‘dealer fee’ of almost $1,000 onto the purchase price.  When I objected to this, they explained that that was their practice, adding a dealer fee to the price of any car purchased from them, including cars from which, as in my case, they had gotten title from their finance company, sight unseen, for the purpose of selling it to me at the end of my lease.  It didn't matter to these thieves that they had already collected a 'dealer fee' from me when the car was leased three years earlier. They just wanted to collect it twice.  

So I walked out and found another dealership, willing to handle my purchase without a dealer fee.  It wasn’t easy, but I found one. (Both dealerships did tack on a few hundred dollars to my purchase price for handling the transaction, but only the original dealership insisted on that $1,000 dealer fee as well.)

The moral of this story is that this dealership is really not interested in customers who object to being ripped off.  They just want to sell or lease cars to dummies, of which there are many thousands in Florida.  Incidentally, they are part of a nationwide conglomerate which owns many dealerships in Florida.  If my experience represents the way they do business, they are to be avoided when one is in the market for a car, because this kind of greed probably pervades their entire operation.  If they don’t screw you one way, they will find another way. 

  *   *   * 

Apparently, some lease finance companies don’t pay attention to Florida’s supposed requirement that they be licensed to sell cars in that State in order to be able to transfer a car’s title to a lessee at the end of a lease for a specified purchase price according to the terms of a lease agreement. To them, transferring title to the lessee on a lease purchase is not the same as selling cars.  They just honor the terms of the lease over the phone, online, or by mail.  No one comes after them for doing that, and they don’t charge a ‘dealer fee.’ (A relative recently purchased their Mercedes at the end of its lease in that manner.  I couldn’t do it, however, with my Lexus, whose financing subsidiary interprets the rules so that its dealerships can profit from a lease-end purchase by the lessee.)

Dealerships just love this supposed interpretation of the regulation since it gives them the opportunity to tack on those obscene dealer fees as well as getting first shot at lending the lessee the money with which to purchase the car at lease end, if they don’t have it immediately available.

If you ever lease a car in Florida, try to make certain that you will have the opportunity, if you choose to purchase the car at lease end, to purchase its title directly from the finance company and not be forced to do it through a dealership.  Insist that this be part of the lease agreement.  If they will not go along with that, insist on a specific listing being included in the lease of all fees which might be added to the purchase price by a dealership at lease end.  If the dealership will not do this, walk.  There are both honest car dealerships and dishonest car dealerships, even in Florida.

JL

                                  *   *   *   * 

To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?       

                                   *   *   *   * 

  

America Afloat 


(A poem that is always worth repeating in these blog postings.                   

To learn more, visit this blog’s posting of July 30, 2022.) 

 




America Afloat

 Jack Lippman

 The greatness of America

Is that it does survive

Attacks upon democracy

Whose flame it keeps alive.

 

The laws that blossom from the words

The Founding Fathers wrote

Still serve us well today to keep

America afloat.

 

This doesn’t happen by itself,

We cannot wish it true,

The bottom line, my friends, is that

It all depends on you.

  JL                        

 

                                           *   *   *   *

     To How Many People Have You Forwarded This Blog Posting?

 

                         That’s Not Enough!