About Me

My photo
BOYNTON BEACH, FL, United States
Jack is a graduate of Rutgers University where he majored in history. His career in the life and health insurance industry involved medical risk selection and brokerage management. Retired in Florida since 2001 after many years in NJ and NY, widowed since 2010, he occasionally writes, paints, plays poker, participates in play readings and is catching up on Shakespeare, Melville and Joyce, etc.

Friday, March 13, 2026

March 13, 2026 - Fueling Antisemitism, Whom to Believe, and a Letter

 

                                                          
                                                           * * *
Fueling Antisemitism 

If you are at all concerned with antisemitism in the United States, please see the latest that liberal columnist Peter Beinart, former editor of the New Republic and author of numerous articles and books, has to say about it. 

At present, Beinart is a professor of journalism and political science at the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York.  He is an editor-at-large at Jewish Currents, a contributing opinion columnist at The New York Times, a political commentator for MSNBC (now MSNOW), CNN, and a fellow at the Foundation for Middle East Peace, according to his biography as found on Wikipedia.

 
Beinart


Beinart points out that, in his opinion, our attacks on Iran were not in the interest of our country but rather primarily in the interest of the State of Israel, effectively delivering the argument that it is not ‘America's war,’ into the hands of antisemites who are not reluctant to use it.  He particularly attacks the role major Jewish organizations have played in letting this happen. 

The other day in his ‘Beinart Notebook,’ he included a video of a Marine Corps veteran being thrown out of a Senate hearing room for loudly demonstrating against our paying for and fighting what he referred to as Israel’s war. (There’s a link to that provided later in this posting.) 

Here is the text which accompanied that video. You may agree or disagree with Beinart in his opposition to our attack on Iran, but it is very, very, important to be aware of its repercussions on antisemitism in this country. 

                                                        * * 
The video transcipt's text reads as follows: 

    ‘So, there’s this video that I just can’t get out of my mind. It’s a video of a man named Brian McGinnis. He’s a retired Marine Corps veteran. And he goes to this Senate hearing, and he starts shouting. He’s in full Marine uniform. And, he starts shouting things like, ‘no one wants to fight for Israel.’ He’s pulled out of the room very, very brutally. It’s a disturbing video to watch. He claims that his arm was broken as he was pushed out, and he keeps shouting some version of this: ‘nobody wants to fight for Israel.’

    I would really encourage you, if you know people who support this war, especially if you know influential people in American politics, in the organized American Jewish community who support this war, to ask them to reflect on this video. Because I think it illustrates, in a terrifying way, the moment that we’re in today.

   The American people did not want this war. The initial polling has shown a strong opposition to the war. And remember, polling about war almost always goes down. Wars are usually most popular at the beginning, right? This war wasn’t even popular at the start. And there’s also good reason to believe that Israel was a major part of the reason that America launched this war. Not the only reason: I think Donald Trump’s hubris from his apparent success in Venezuela, and of the 12-Day War, and the Soleimani killing, all of these things have gone to his head and made him think—idiot that he is—that this is gonna be easy, that he can do in Venezuela. He’s basically said as much.

     So, it’s not only because of Israel. But anyone with eyes to see knows that Benjamin Netanyahu has wanted the United States to launch a full-scale assault on Iran for many, many, many years. It’s been an obsession of him for his entire political career. He’s open about it, right? And that he’s particularly been pushing Donald Trump to do so, and he took advantage of the vanity, the stupidity of this president that we have, and the brokenness of the foreign policy-making process to be able to get this done, right?

     So, what people said about Iraq—that Israel pushed the United States into war in Iraq, which is mostly not true. Israel was not focused on the U.S. invading Iraq, even back then, it was focused on Iran. It is much, much more true today. And what this Marine Corps veteran was saying has actually become the mainstream public understanding of why the U.S. did go to war, that it was pushed into it by Israel. And there’s a significant kernel of truth to that. 

    And this is happening in a moment in which real antisemitism is already rising. I’m not talking about the bullshit claims of antisemitism that say that people are antisemitic because they ask whether it might be better off if Israel were a country that treated everyone equally under the law, rather than based on Jewish supremacy. No. I mean, Nick Fuentes, Candace Owen, quoting the Talmud, spinning conspiracy theories about Jewish holocausts of Christians, all of this kind of stuff. This is really rising, right?

    It’s rising partly just because all forms of bigotry are now rising as American liberal democracy fails, and this kind of authoritarian ethno-nationalism rises. But it’s also rising because of this specific claim that America has been pushed into wars by Israel with the support of large Jewish donors like Miriam Adelson and Jewish organizations like AIPAC.

    And if you wanted to supercharge, if you wanted to supercharge that antisemitism, nothing, nothing could have supercharged it more than what we have seen right now. The chances that MAGA 2.0 or MAGA 3.0 will be openly antisemitic—not veiled antisemitism—but openly antisemitic, the language of Fuentes, the language of Candace Owens, are now much, much greater. And we may see more of this open antisemitism also on the left too because it may well be popular on parts of the left, as well as the right.

     Now, I don’t expect Benjamin Netanyahu to have taken the safety and well-being of American Jews into account when he made this decision, right? Netanyahu is the elected leader of Israel. He responds to the electorate of Israel. Most Palestinians who live under Israeli control are not part of that electorate, right? He responds to the electorate of Israel and the sense of its self-perception, right? I think that is actually also going to be disastrous over the long term for Israel, but Netanyahu responds to Israelis.

    Israeli leaders have never actually put the interests of diaspora Jews, made that been a serious focus of their foreign policy if it’s conflicted with their sense of Israeli national interest. That’s why Netanyahu hangs out with Viktor Orban. This is an old story. This is why Menachem Begin was pals with Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, they’ve hung out with antisemites for decades and decades if those people supported Israel.

    But we do have the right to hope that the leaders of the organized American Jewish community, whose responsibility is to Jews in the United States, that they would think about the consequences of this war for us. And the consequences are catastrophic, right? If you were a small minority in a country, which American Jews are, a small minority, also we have as baggage a very long history of antisemitic stereotypes about Jews, right?

    You have to have a decent respect for the opinions of the other people in your country, right? A decent respect for the opinions of the American people, right? And what the pushing and now celebration of this war from AIPAC, from the Anti-Defamation League, from the American Jewish Committee, and for a whole series of commentators, right, who are associated with those organizations, what their attitude shows is, basically, a lack of respect for the opinions of the American people, and a lack of understanding of the position of American Jews in this society.

    I want to be clear about what I’m saying. American Jews are and deserve to be understood as absolutely full citizens in this society. But being a full citizen, an owner of this country, right, doesn’t only mean rights, it also entails certain obligations. It entails the obligation to think seriously about the national interest of this country.

    The claim that it was in America’s national interest to spend billions of dollars trying to topple the Iranian regime is just nonsense. Can anybody with a straight face say that if the U.S. government has $10 billion, that the $10 billion are best spent doing this, rather than dealing with the many, many, many terrible challenges we have at home? Of course not. It’s an insult to people’s intelligence to suggest this, right?

    And what the organized American Jewish community is doing by pushing this, it is creating a dynamic in which it’s going to be even easier for antisemitism to spread, and for American Jews to be seen as not people who are part of a country trying to think about what’s best for that country, but to play exactly in to what Fuentes and others say. Which is that American Jews are not interested in the welfare of this country, not interested in the economic and the human costs of America going to war, because American Jews are loyal to Israel, right?

    This is the narrative that by supporting this war, American Jewish organizations are promoting. Obviously, the antisemites are responsible for their own antisemitism, but wise and sane Jewish leadership does not play into the hands of Nick Fuentes and Candace Owens, especially in a very, very dangerous moment like this.

    And if you listen, right, to the people in the American Jewish community who are defending this war, right? And when they’re responding to people like Tucker Carlson and others who are saying this was a war for Israel, it’s not a war for the United States, their response is very telling.

    They say: are you questioning Donald Trump? Are you saying Donald Trump is a traitor, right? What, essentially, they’re doing is, they’re saying, don’t you dare criticize Donald Trump. They’re not making a serious policy argument. They’re basically trying to play on the authoritarian tendency and instinct that exists within the Republican Party and the MAGA movement today in order to shield themselves and this war from criticism, right?

    And this, I think, is a terrifying sign of things to come. Which is to say, the American Jewish community, in the middle of the 20th century, had a strategy, a democratic strategy, a strategy of pushing for greater democracy, and of trying to be engaged in that struggle.

    The American Jewish leadership now is doing things that are nakedly opposed to what the American people want. And when people express that public opposition, they are essentially taking refuge in the authoritarianism of the Trump movement, and saying, how dare you criticize Donald Trump, right? He is above criticism, and that’s their defense, right?

    This is part, and I think we’re going to see going more forward, the more you lose the American people, right, the more Americans become hostile, right, the more antisemitism grows, the more you have to ally with authoritarian dictators as for your safety, right? You abandon a democratic strategy—a small-D democratic strategy for Jewish safety and well-being—and you go back to this much older model, right, of the court Jew clinging to the authoritarian leader as the public turns more and more anti-Jewish.

    I don’t think the American Jewish establishment understands that this is the direction that they’re going, but this is actually the direction that they’re going to have to go because of their own policies, because they can’t distinguish between what the Israeli government wants and what’s good for the American people.

    And I think partly, this is a result of how cloistered the American Jewish establishment is. I’m not talking about American Jews in general. American Jews are widely integrated into American society in all kinds of ways. But the oligarchy that runs American Jewish organizations, the large donors, the people who work for those very large donors, that is a very cloistered, self-enclosed world in many ways. And I think it shields people from an actual understanding, in some ways, of what’s happening in American society, about the suffering that Americans endure as a result of these wars, that the American Jewish organizations keep pushing for. And I don’t think that these people in these positions either understand or are willing to understand how dangerous their actions are for us as American Jews.

    Watch again this video with Brian McGinnis, and ask yourself how it makes you feel as a Jew in the United States today to be represented by organizations that have pushed the United States into war, into this war. I will say, for me, it makes me feel as frightened as an American Jew for my safety in the United States as I can ever remember in my lifetime.’

                                                         * * 

There’s a lot here with which to agree or with which to disagree, but it certainly is worth checking out. 

Because it originated as a spoken text accompanying a video presentation rather than standing on its own as a written opinion piece, the presence of its grammatical errors is understandable. 

Nevertheless, I object to Beinart’s repeatedly using the questioning word ‘right?’ over a dozen times in his narrative, assuming that by continuing to read further, the viewer or reader must acknowledge to some extent that they are in agreement with him. That’s a cheap trick to which one with his journalistic experience should not resort. He should leave it up to the reader to decide whether his words are ‘right’ or not. 

You can see the video he mentions by clicking here here or copying and pasting peterbeinart.substack.com on your browser line and looking for his March 9 ‘Beinart Notebook’ posting, most of which is quoted above. 

JL 

                                                            * * * 
Whom to Believe About the War with Iran and Keeping Up with the Blondes 

There continues to be significant disparities among reports regarding the war in Iran between what our president is saying, what the Iranians are saying, and what supposedly objective journalists are reporting. I continue to turn to Professor Heather Cox Richardson to try to untangle what is being reported. Check her site daily at https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/  to try to get a handle on what is happening. 

One thing that is becoming clear already is that the Iranians are not the Venezuelan-type pushovers that Trump believed they were. 

This brings to mind David Halberstam’s 1972 book, ‘The Best and the Brightest,’ described by Artificial Intelligence as being ‘a seminal 1972 book that critically examines the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, focusing on the paradox of highly intelligent, well-educated leaders who escalated the conflict despite its growing failure. The book uses biographical portraits of policymakers from the Kennedy and Johnson administrations to explain how America became mired in the war and why it was lost, becoming a definitive history of the "Vietnam tragedy.” 

And President Trump’s advisors are far from being the ‘best and the brightest.’ 

Frankly, the least reliable source of all seems to be the President and his press secretary, another blonde wearing a cross so that everyone knows her faith. What they say is full of contradictions and sometimes includes criticism of those who don’t agree with them. Gee whiz, how can someone so religious as Karoline tell lies? 

Leavitt



And speaking of such blondes, I hear that Attorney General Pam Bondi has moved from her D.C. apartment to quarters on a military base. Apparently ‘open carry’ is insufficient protection for her. 

JL 

                                                         * * * 

A Letter Gets Published

For those of you who don’t read the South Florida SunSentinel, here’s a copy of the letter from me they published on March 11. 

 ‘It’s all about your vote’ (their heading): ‘Calls to impeach the president or remove him via the 25th Amendment are hollow rhetoric, so long as the line of succession starts with Vice President JD Vance and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who support him. Trump’s opponents can best express themselves by voting against Republicans at all levels on Election Day.’ 
... Jack Lippman, Boynton Beach 

JL 

                                                         * * * 

Housekeeping on Jackspotpourri 

Your comments on this ‘blog’ would be appreciated. My Email address is jacklippman18@gmail.com. 

Forwarding Postings: Please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it (Friends, relatives, enemies, etc.) If you want to send someone the blog, you can just tell them to check it out by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or you can provide a link to that address in your email to them. 

There’s another, perhaps easier, method of forwarding it though! Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, makes that possible. If you click on the tiny envelope with the arrow at the bottom of every posting, you will have the opportunity to list up to ten email addresses to which that blog posting will be forwarded, along with a brief comment from you. Each will receive a link to click on that will directly connect them to the blog. Either way will work, sending them the link to https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com , or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting. 

Email Alerts: If you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do. And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. You can pass those email addresses to me by email at jacklippman18@gmail.com

More on the Sources of Information in Jackspotpourri: The sources of information used by Jackspotpourri include a delivered local daily ‘paper’ newspaper (now the South Florida Sun Sentinel) and what appears in my daily email; that includes the views of many contributors, including the New York Times and other respected journals. Be aware that when I open that email, I first quickly glance at and screen out those sent to my very old former email address and those considered ‘promotional’ by Gmail’s system as no more than advertisements or requests for donations. 

Besides these sources, I also utilize the Google search engine where I can look up any subject I want. Lately, these search results have been headed by a very generalized summary clearly labeled as being developed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). On occasion I might use such search results, but when I do, I will say that I am doing so. Generally, however, I try not to use such summaries in preparing Jackspotpourri. 

Following such ‘AI’ search results, there follows the other results of my search. *Unlike the anonymous AI-generated summaries, the sources of these results are clearly indicated, giving them a greater credibility than any AI summary. I feel that It comes down to who YOU want to be in the driver’s seat in seeking information: yourself or something else (Artificial Intelligence), the structure of which somewhere along the way had to have been created by others, with whose identity I am neither familiar nor comfortable. At least when I read a column by Timothy Snyder, for example, I know from where it comes, and to some extent, what to expect. 

Caution should be exercised in using Artificial Intelligence.  Always! 

JL 

                                                     * * * *

No comments: