About Me

My photo
Jack is a graduate of Rutgers University where he majored in history. His career in the life and health insurance industry involved medical risk selection and brokerage management. Retired in Florida for over two decades after many years in NJ and NY, he occasionally writes, paints, plays poker, participates in play readings and is catching up on Shakespeare, Melville and Joyce, etc.

Sunday, January 29, 2023

01-29-2023 - DeSantis May Not Like Shakespeare, and Murder in Memphis plus Why Cops are That Way

                                                   * * * * 


Murder in Memphis … and Why it Happened!

By now all of you have seen, or at least read about, the terrible violence carried out by the Memphis police on a Black man for no more than a possible, unproven, traffic violation.  In a strange way, it is fortunate that the five policemen, all of whom have been fired and charged with second degree murder, were Black.  

Rioters facing police in Memphis this week
after video of  Tyre Nichols beating released. (NBC)

Imagine what the situation would be there today, even worse than it is, if they had not been of the same skin color as their victim.  When their trials take place, the death penalty will not be a consideration since their acts weren’t premeditated, but they could spend the rest of their lives behind bars.

There is a measure of arrogance present in the manner in which some, not all, police officers carry out their duties which come down to preserving the peace and preventing crime.  Given a nightstick and a gun, a veneer of supposed authority and toughness comes along with them that would otherwise not be present. 

This is not accidental.

The arrogance and demeanor of the officers who murdered Tyre Nichols have sometimes been referred to as a ‘warrior mindset.’ The reason for this kind of attitude was explored about 30 years ago in an F.B.I. study of criminals who had been specifically incarcerated for murdering police officers.  In interviewing them, it became clear that police officers who are killed in the line of duty usually have similar characteristics!

To quote from a New Yorker magazine article on the subject, At the top of an inventory of “behavioral descriptors” linked to officers who ended up dead, the study listed traits that some citizens might prize: “friendly,” “well-liked by community and department,” “tends to use less force than other officers felt they would use in similar circumstances,” and “used force only as last resort.” The cop killers, the agents concluded from their prison conversations, had attacked officers with a “good-natured demeanor.” An officer’s failure to dominate—to immediately enforce full control over the suspect—proved fatal.’ 

The ‘good guys’ on the force, it would appear, are the ones most likely not to survive to reach retirement age.  Police officers, and perhaps even those who train them, were influenced, usually indirectly and informally, by this study, and as a result, whether intentional or not, they developed strongly dominating, aggressive behavior patterns which were likely to prevent their being killed by criminals while on the job. 

This was the mindset of those who beat Rodney King, those who murdered George Floyd and Tyre Nichols, and those who committed numerous other acts of brutality in the line of duty.  It is not something they can turn on or off.  It is the way they instinctively behave in order to survive on the job.

Check out the New Yorker article at https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-police-folklore-that-helped-kill-tyre-nichols?utm_source=nl&utm_brand=tny&utm_mailing=TNY_Daily_012823&utm_campaign=aud-dev&utm_medium=email&utm_term=tny_daily_digest&bxid=5c941c22b90c2f4a9f76d533&cndid=56749612&hasha=02fa158150d34dc186b01b1b8ec7a224&hashb=272a72a5c15a7235afb1dfcb769372a42fe06d21&hashc=033d2070fe1faa4dfea53a4950e7d0ed837513fd06d41e88f2d7b6b7c74af785&esrc=subscribe-page&mbid=CRMNYR062419 

or JUST CLICK HERE.

There is no need, as some demand, to ‘defund the police.’  Rather, they must be taught to handle and use their authority carefully, respecting the rights of all citizens, putting that before the development of attitudes which might save them from being killed in the line of duty.  That is a lot to ask of them.

That is a risk those who become police officers must take. Their capability to do that should be determined very early in a police officer’s career, if possible even before he or she is given a badge. 

If police officers appear incapable of doing this, they should find some other way of earning a living.  Perhaps a career in the armed forces might be a better place for those with a ‘warrior mindset.’ 

JL

                                *  *  *  * 

Is Shakespeare on DeSantis’ List?

I am waiting for Florida’s governor and his sycophants who run the State’s Department of Education to ban the teaching of Shakespeare in the State’s secondary schools.  It seems that some parents have discovered that in Shakespeare’s time, females were not permitted to perform on the stage, so all those wonderful roles William Shakespeare wrote for women were played by men, and that just won’t do in the Sunshine State, where it might be taken as the ‘grooming’ of tender, impressionable, minds in the wrong direction.

Sooner or later, high school students would learn that such roles as Juliet, Desdemona, Portia, Lady Macbeth, Ophelia, King Lear’s daughters, the Merry Wives of Windsor, Cleopatra, Caesar’s wife, and many others who trod the Elizabethan stage were played by gentlemen dressing as women and made up to look like them, characteristics we now associate with ‘drag queens’! 

Lady Macbeth, originally played by male actor

It goes on and on.  The Bard occasionally went even further, sometimes having his actors ‘in drag’ who were portraying women pretend to be male as part of a play’s plot.  An example is ‘As You Like It,’ where the heroine (Rosalind), played by a man, in his role as a woman, pretends to be a man trying to teach her would-be boyfriend how to be a bit more forward with her.  Men portraying women pretending to be men! That is wild!  Shakespeare knew exactly what he was doing. I suspect that the audiences in 1600 loved it, watching what we would call a ‘drag queen’ pretending to be a guy. 

This didn’t last very much longer.  A few years later, when Oliver Cromwell took over in England, he shut down all the theatres, and recommended that people go to church instead, so long as it was a church of which he approved.  Ron DeSantis would never go that far, but as for Shakespeare, I don’t know.

JL

                       *  *  *  *

Two Items of Interest:

·       Email AlertsIf you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do.  And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. 

         You can pass those email addresses to me by email at            jacklippman18@gmail.com .

·       Forwarding Postings: And of course, please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it.  Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, now makes that very easy.  If you click on the envelope with the arrow at the conclusion of every posting, (it looks like this: ), you will have the opportunity to list a number of email addresses, along with a comment from you, each of which will receive a link to the full blog that you now are reading, with all of its bells and whistles.  Or you can just tell folks to check out the blog by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or by providing a link to that address in your email to them.

 

Either way will work, sending them the link above or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting. 

 Have a nice day!



Wednesday, January 25, 2023

01-25-2023 - A Divided House, Fears & Hatreds, More Avoidable Shootings, Wealth Redistribution?, Another Letter, and Two 'Must Read' Columns

Lincoln and Douglas in 1858

 
A House Divided Cannot Stand


When Abraham Lincoln, in debating Stephen Douglas in the 1858 Illinois Senate contest (which he lost) said 'a house divided cannot stand ... ,' he meant that the split in the nation could not endure and that the country ultimately must go in either direction and not remain split. The issue then was the expansion of slavery into new territories.

The Civil War ostensibly remedied that ‘split,’ but really, did it resolve deeper ideological differences between the contending sides?  Nope.

The issue today is not one single thing, as it was in 1858, but whether the views of a minority of Americans should prevail over the views of a majority as to the role of government. That boils down to how well our government's structure enables the preservation of American democracy, the enabling of the people to make decisions in the best interest of the majority of them, one of the reasons the original thirteen colonies broke away from England in the first place.  

Should that structure (which includes an unbalanced electoral college, two senators for every state regardless of population, legal gerrymandering, all powers not in Constitution being left to the States, etc.) be revised in a more democratic direction or left as it is?  Until this is resolved by legislation or Constitutional amendment, we remain a ‘house divided.’

JL 

                            *  *  *  *

Catering to the Right-WingEchoing South Pacific

A Federal judge recently ruled that that Florida’s Governor DeSantis violated the Constitution, stepping on the elected Hillsborough County (Tampa) prosecutor’s First Amendment rights, by firing him for saying that he wasn’t going to chase after violators of Florida’s abortion restrictions.  But the judge went on to say that he was not in a position to reinstate that fired Democratic prosecutor, enabling DeSantis to claim the decision as a victory for himself.   DeSantis manages to get away with many such violations, stepping on long-standing Constitutional rights.  What he does is never in the interest of the people, but always to lock in the votes of right-wing conservatives.  

So it is with the Republican majorities in the House of Representatives and many State legislatures.  Whatever appeals to those on the far right is what gets done.  Their votes are crucial to such politicians.

No matter how damning the clear evidence that is revealed in courtrooms and in the media every day may be, it does not change the convictions of right-wing supporters of Republicans in Congress and in State Houses, like DeSantis.  Why?  They remain motivated by fears and hatreds fed to them by those whose aims do not include serving the best interests of the citizens of this great country.

Even FoxNews' 'mea culpa' and Alex Jones' being destroyed in Court doesn't matter to them. If those fears and hatreds make them comfortable, they will believe anything.

These lyrics, written by Oscar Hammerstein II, from the ground-breaking musical ‘South Pacific,’ say it all.  And that is why control over what is ‘taught’ in schools is becoming a political issue in many parts of this country.

“You've got to be taught

To hate and fear,

You've got to be taught

From year to year,

It's got to be drummed

In your dear little ear

You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught to be afraid

Of people whose eyes are oddly made,

And people whose skin is a diff'rent shade,

You've got to be carefully taught.

You've got to be taught before it's too late,

Before you are six or seven or eight,

To hate all the people your relatives hate,

You've got to be carefully taught!”

JL

                        *  *  *  *

Two More Shootings and a Daytona Tragedy

This time in California.  We never learn.  The number of weapons in circulation and available in this country makes these tragedies possible.  Mental issues, vengeance, gang warfare … whatever … the availability of guns makes such killings possible. 


And I just read of the woman who walked into her terminally ill husband’s room in a Daytona Beach hospital and shot him dead.  They had earlier agreed to do this when the death of one of them became imminent, the family’s gun being more readily accessible to them than a less bloody fatal poison to carry out an agreed-upon murder and suicide pact. She was also supposed to take her own life as well but couldn’t quite bring herself to squeeze the trigger a second time.  This tragedy, and it is a tragedy, goes back to these retirees having a gun in the house to use in carrying out their agreement, like a common piece of household equipment. Washers, dryers, stoves, TVs, aspirin in the medicine chest, etc., guns … all ‘normal’ to all too many Americans.  That is wrong!  (She was arrested after an hours-long standoff in the hospital, where other patients had been endangered by this lady pointing her pistol at anyone trying to enter her dead husband’s room.)


The solution is very simple.  Strong gun control laws will reduce gun violence! 
Anyone who opposes such laws contributes to mass murders, gang shootings and makes possible events like the sad tragedy in the Daytona hospital.  They are accessories to murders like the two in California in the news right now.  And that includes members of Congress and State legislators.

No one wants to take away weapons from hunters, target shooters or even for personal protection at homes or businesses, and those rights must be preserved, but as a starter, the Second Amendment must be either repealed, replaced, or at least significantly modified by Supreme Court decision, and not in the evil and misguided direction of the late Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2008 misinterpretation of that Amendment. 

Poor Justice Scalia, it turns out, was unaware that he was Satan’s unwitting representative on the Supreme Court of the United States back then. That decision has caused hundreds, if not thousands, of unnecessary deaths in this country. Blood is on the hands of the Justices who voted to make them possible, but especially on those of the late Justice Scalia who wrote the opinion in D.C. vs Heller that, in effect, erased the first thirteen words of the Second Amendment.  

(We are the only nation in the world where there are more guns than people!)  

JL

                       *  *  *  *

Great Wealth and What to Do About It – Redistribution via Taxation?

The January 23 issue of the New Yorker magazine includes an article about a wealth manager and her relationship with a particular client.   Forgetting the details of the particular situation written about, the article points up the truly unbelievable wealth which has been accumulated by some families and individuals in this country, and the steps, some entirely legal, some illegal, and some ‘on the fence,’ their wealth managers take to preserve this wealth for succeeding generations. 

I am not a communist, but no person should be able to acquire that much wealth in our country and pass it on to their heirs untouched.  That supposedly went out with the ‘Middle Ages.’  We no longer have royalty and aristocracy in our country. Families should not get away with having many billions of dollars of assets, and palatial dwellings all over the world. Taxes are supposed to have some leveling effect on the distribution of wealth in this country.  The jaw-dropping extent of such wealth may be the reason that in this, the richest nation in the world, poverty still exists and there are homeless people sleeping on the streets. 

From the unbelievably great wealth described in article, I get the feeling that such homelessness and poverty might easily be eliminated if a family’s accumulation of wealth were limited to something ‘reasonable’ like a measly five hundred million dollars or so, and the excess paid in taxes.  (Many corporate CEOs make close to that each year in their annual compensation, including bonuses and stock options, while many of their employees earn a minimum wage, or not much more than it.) 

Wealth redistribution, via taxes paying for government benefits for those who need them, is the logical solution.  Estate taxes were supposed to solve this problem but wealth managers easily find ways to avoid them so that money never finds its way into the pockets of the rest of the population.  It is just rolled into the family’s next generation, minimally taxed if taxed at all.  I feel this ‘leveling’ is something the government should be doing by its tax policy … and possibly why the Republicans in the House are united against properly funding the Internal Revenue Service.  

The wealthy donors who finance the candidacy of many in Congress  (and that includes some Democrats as well as Republicans) want it to stay the way it is, keeping the government (and that means the IRS) as far away as possible from their wealth and without the tools to get closer to it.

And don’t tell me that is communism

JL

                                      *  *  *  *

I Keep Writing Letters

Content of a Letter I sent to the Palm Beach Post on Jan. 24

The article in Tuesday's Post about Governor DeSantis' administration rejecting the new Advanced Placement course on African American Studies for use in Florida schools mentioned only one long-time Republican person of color switching to 'independent' because of that.  Every Republican Black official in Florida, either elected or appointed, should follow suit and switch their registration to either 'No Party Affiliation,' or Democratic.  At a minimum, they should not be supporting Governor DeSantis. Those that continue to do so have a serious problem with their priorities and should open their eyes.

I will let you know if they publish it.

JL

                          *  *  *  *

Two ‘Not to Be Missed’ Opinions 

Find Time to Read Them

And speaking of the Palm Beach Post, two columns appeared in its January 25 edition.  One reproduced Heather Cox Richardson’s recent ‘Letters from an American’ blog posting explaining how abortion first became an issue during Richard Nixon’s 1972 re-election campaign, a year before Roe vs Wade. Find it at https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/january-21-2023 or CLICK HERE.

The other, originally an opinion piece in the New York Times by former Senator Gary Hart, a failed seeker of the Democratic presidential nomination almost half a century ago, severely criticizes House Speaker McCarthy’s vengeful efforts to investigate the ‘weaponization’ of government against conservatives.  Check it out at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/17/opinion/church-committee-republicans.html or CLICK HERE.

JL

                       *  *  *  *

  

Two Items of Interest:

·       Email AlertsIf you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do.  And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. 

 You can pass those email addresses to me by email at           jacklippman18@gmail.com 

 Forwarding Postings: And of course, please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it.  Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, now makes that very easy.  If you click on the envelope with the arrow at the conclusion of every posting, (it looks like this:  )  ,you will have the opportunity to list a number of  email addresses, along with a comment from you, each of which will receive a link to the full blog that you now are reading, with all of its bells and whistles.  Or you can just tell folks to check out the blog by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or by providing a link to that address in your email to them.

Either way will work, sending them the link above or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting. 

        


Have a nice day.