About Me

My photo
Jack is a graduate of Rutgers University where he majored in history. His career in the life and health insurance industry involved medical risk selection and brokerage management. Retired in Florida for over two decades after many years in NJ and NY, he occasionally writes, paints, plays poker, participates in play readings and is catching up on Shakespeare, Melville and Joyce, etc.

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

The Price of Expanding Democracy?




Founding Fathers and the Constitution
Back in 1789, when the representatives of the thirteen former British colonies got together and established the United States of America, based upon its newly written Constitution, they represented the voters in their States.  Directly or indirectly, that’s how they got to Philadelphia.  Let’s look at those voters who sent them there.  Generally, to be able to vote in those days, one had to be a property owner or meet some other restrictive requirements.  

As a result, it turned out that those who did have the right to vote were more or less educated, they were readers of newspapers and books, conversant with political and economic issues and able to deal with their conflicts and disagreements in a rational, civil manner.  Hence, those who “elected” the writers of our Constitution, our Founding Fathers, were not the common working men nor farm laborers.  The typical citizen of the new nation did not have the right to vote in 1789.  But this somewhat elitist body of voters soon changed.

Jackson
By the time Andrew Jackson was elected President in 1828, the right to vote had been expanded in almost all States to include almost all adults (except women and slaves).  This far broader electorate was generally less educated and less familiar with the issues facing the nation than was the more restricted electorate of earlier years. But politicians like it that way!     Emotional appeal of candidates, campaigning and party loyalties became more crucial in determining the result of elections than knowledge of the issues.

This was the price the country paid for the expansion of democracy to more and more of its citizens. 

If the Founding Fathers of 1789 had been sent to Philadelphia to write a Constitution by an electorate made up of the kind of voters which existed forty years later, I do not think we would have ended up with the same Constitution we have today, or perhaps none at all.   I suspect that we would have gotten a government where the power of the President would have been much greater that the Founders provided in 1789.  With the strength of a greatly expanded body of less sophisticated voters backing them, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, and Abraham Lincoln, for example, all stretched the powers which the Constitution gave to the President far beyond that which the Founding Fathers contemplated.  This continued through some subsequent presidencies and continues today, despite efforts by the Legislative branch, and occasionally, the Judicial branch as well, to limit presidential power, which, particularly in times of crisis, seems to know no limit.

But let us return to 2019, or more specifically, to efforts to impeach the President and the 2020 elections.  The testimony and documentation presented in the House Intelligence Committee’s hearings, based on factual testimony from neutral experts, unequivocally make it clear that there is more than adequate unchallenged evidence present to impeach the President of the United States.

The 45th President
Those who oppose impeachment hang their hats on discredited “fictions,” thoroughly investigated by and proven wrong by our intelligence services.  In the face of logic and fact, they persist in insisting on the veracity of what has been repeatedly proven to be wrong.  Stubbornly hanging on to this position, they will unsuccessfully fight the inevitable Bill of Impeachment which the House will soon pass.  They will be more successful in the Senate, however, where the Republican majority cowers in fear of the losing the votes of the President’s supporters, who believe any and all lies told in his defense.

This is what the Founding Fathers did not anticipate in 1789, that we would have an expanded, misinformed, electorate which makes up its mind based on campaigning, emotional appeal and party loyalties rather than knowledge of issues.  Hence, the President will be let off by the Senate.   He will get away with his malfeasance.  As it developed during the nineteenth century, this is the price the country paid, and continues to pay, for the expansion of democracy to more and more of its citizens. 

Yes, there are dangers to unlimited democracy just as there are dangers to the elitism of the Founding Fathers.   The Constitution which they devised works to deal with both of these dangers with its balancing act between the three branches of government, even in the environment of an expanded electorate.  We must have faith in it.

This dichotomy will persist in the 2020 presidential election.  One side will have the facts and truth on its side.  The other will stand firm in denying facts and truth and their votes will count just as much, even though they are based on a belief, often naïve or honest, in lies, usually originating with the President.  

Make sure your vote counts.
Jack Lippman

No comments: