The President Should Declare a National Emergency
Indeed
there is a National Emergency! And in
the absence of remedial action by the Congress, it is necessary for the
President to declare one to exist! Yes!
But
it has nothing whatsoever to do with our Southern border. It is the gun violence which exists in this
country today manifested by periodic mass shootings such as what took place at Parkland, Sutherland Springs, the Las Vegas concert, Aurora, Sebring, San Bernardino, Columbine, Pittsburgh,
Newtown, the Pulse Night Club and other locations almost too numerous to
mention. True, the perpetrators of these
shootings were mentally unbalanced, all of them, but that is not the avenue to
pursue to find a remedy. It is
impossible to keep track of all of the disturbed people in our country, or
those whose anger might push them over the edge into irresponsibly dangerous
behavior involving weapons. (And of course, we have terrorists as well to
consider.)
This
is the National Emergency which the President must address. It is time to recognize that beside the unpoliceable and warped mental state of the killers, there is only one thing these
tragedies have in common: guns. The
proliferation of firearms in the hands of Americans is the emergency we face!
Congress and the Supreme Court have failed to
deal with it properly and people continue to be killed. And they are killed
with bullets shot from guns, of which there are over 300,000,000 in this country in civilian hands. Three Hundred Million guns! And this is because of the perpetuation of a gross misinterpretation of the Second Amendment to our Constitution. This is the National
Emergency which the President must address. Lives are at stake, and far, far, more than any perceived danger on our Southern border.
The
Second Amendment of the Constitution should be suspended until it can be
properly rewritten to allow the possession of weapons by civilians only for hunting, target
shooting, and to a very limited and carefully defined extent, personal
protection. During such a National Emergency,
possession of a weapon for other than these reasons should be treated as a
felony.
I
call upon the President to declare such a National Emergency today! He has the power to do it.
Jack Lippman
If Men Were Angels, No Government Would Be Necessary James Madison
In
the previous posting, I recommended Federalist
Papers 47 and 51 as required reading for our Congress, and anyone else
with some time to spare. (the Federalist
Papers were a collection of essays written back in 1787 and 1788 in support of ratification by New York State of the
new Constitution.) They were written by Alexander Hamilton,
James Madison and John Jay. (No slouches!) Numbers 47
and 51, quoted from here, were written by Madison.
James Madison |
Both
dealt with the “separation of powers” in the new
government. Number 47 pointed out the dangers of not having that separation and illustrated the necessity of having it protected in the proposed Constitution and Number 51
described how the checks and balances built into the Constitution would
work. Here follow some excerpts from the
words of James Madison. (The highlighting is mine, not
Madison’s.)
When you read them, please think about how they today apply to our
three branches of government: legislative, executive and judicial, and more
specifically, how they apply to our President well as to the Republican leadership
in the Senate and the Democratic leadership in the House of
Representatives. Read on:
From No. 47 – “The accumulation of all powers,
legislative, executive, and judicial, in the same hands, whether of one, a few,
or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be
pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”
“where the whole power of one department is exercised by the same hands
which possess the whole power of another department, the fundamental principles
of a free constitution are subverted.”
“When the legislative and
executive powers are united in the same person or body,” says he, “there can be
no liberty …” (Here Madison quotes the political philosopher, Montesquieu)
“the legislative departments
shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them; the
executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either
of them; the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive
powers, or either of them.” (Here
Madison describes how the several State constitutions have dealt with the
separation of powers. This example, he
cites, was from the Massachusetts Constitution.)
From No. 51 – “To what expedient, then, shall we finally
resort for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the
several departments as laid down in the Constitution? The only answer that can be given is, that as
all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate,
the defect must be supplied by
so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several
constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each
other in their proper places.”
Talking to one another is necessary |
“each department should have a
will of its own.”
“If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither
external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.”
“the constant aim is to divide
and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on
the other.”
“In republican government the legislative authority necessarily
predominates.
The remedy for this inconveniency is to divide the legislature into
different branches.”
“As the weight of the legislative
authority requires that it should be thus divided, the weakness of the
executive may require, on the other hand, that it should be fortified.”
“Justice is the end of government.
It is the end of civil society. (By “end,” Madison means “goal” or “aim.”) It ever has been and ever will be pursued until it be obtained, or
until liberty be lost in the pursuit.
In a society under the forms of which the stronger faction can readily
unite and oppress the weaker, anarchy may as truly be said to reign as in a
state of nature, where the weaker individual is not secured against the
violence of the stronger; and, as in the latter state even the stronger individuals are
prompted, by the uncertainty of their condition, to submit to a government which may protect the
weak as well as themselves …”
Dealing With the President's Success
Gerson |
The
one thing the President has done successfully is to have avoided the kind of
direct contact with already convicted criminals and those under indictment sufficient
to justify his impeachment and removal from office. It is clear that he is unfit for the office
he holds (check out a recent column - published on Jan. 28 - by the Washington Post's Michael Gerson BY CLICKING HERE) but unfortunately,
we will be stuck with him until 2020 unless he resigns. Gerson makes clear that Trump's campaign promises were worthless.
Robert Mueller's report, if and when released, I predict, will fall short of justifying indicting Donald Trump. But it will still cast a great shadow upon him, enough to religate his presidency to the sewer of American history, where it will force the rats already there to scurry away in horror.
Unidentified Occupant of White House |
Needless
to say, the President has numerous supporters, but look who they are and what
they are saying. Examine both their
credibility and their arguments and it becomes clear that both have the
substance of tissue paper. As I repeatedly
have urged, watch Fox News to understand how Trump’s supporters have been
brainwashed with half-truths, outright lies and innuendo. (Malcolm Nance's book - See "Politicklers" below - attributes this to Russian efforts.) But this support, sadly, is what, along with that of those legislators
who knowingly and hypocritically depend on the votes of Trump's "base" to remain in
office, enables the President to avoid impeachment, regardless of the damage he does to the nation. (And in the background, the Russians and perhaps the Chinese are smiling.)
The
answer: Only vote for those candidates
who openly oppose not only the President, but all elected officials who support
him. Mitch McConnell and Marco Rubio are no better than Donald Trump. They are his enablers. There are no good Republicans
unless they strongly denounce and oppose the President, and this is not the time for
seeking shelter in the middle of the road. Too much is at stake.
JL
Some Politicklers
- The United States is definitely NOT a banana republic. If it were, by this time the military would have engineered a coup and for the country's good, seized the government and sent the President into exile. That's the way it is usually done south of the Rio Grande. But we are not a banana republic.
- Actually, Donald Trump is not the problem. The millions of Americans who voted for him and who support him for any number of reasons, most of which won't hold water, are! He is the legitimately elected President of the United States and because of them, we are stuck with him. And when Trump is gone, they will be the problem, a very big one.
- Well, I’ve finished Malcolm Nance’s “The Plot to Destroy
Democracy.”
Nance
Despite its lack of good
editing, making it a more difficult read than it should be, its message cannot
be ignored. Vladimir Putin’s massive
effort to weaken democracy in the Western world, using every intelligence,
communications, electronic, social, political and most importantly, psychological,
tool available provided him with what was initially a naïve, gullible and unwitting
asset … but once ensnared, one that has become a more willing asset to be used
in the destruction of democracy, replacing it with Russia-centered autocracy. That asset is Donald J. Trump, whose vanity, ego and no more than modest intelligence prevent him from understanding how he is being used. I am sure the intelligence apparatus of the
United States, and Special Prosecutor Mueller as well, know everything, and far
more, than is contained in Nance’s book.
That will save democracy unless it is already too late.
Nance |
JL
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email
every time a new posting appears. If you wish to be added to that
Email list, just let me know by sending me an email at Riart1@aol.com.
HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACKSPOTPOURRI.com
Contact me by email at Riart1@aol.com. YOU ALSO
CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR
COMMENTS AT THAT ADDRESS. (Comments can also be made by clicking on the
"Post a Comment" link at the blog's end, though few followers of the
blog have done that lately.)
MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO
AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?
HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the
appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right or
scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this
posting. The “Search Box” in the right side of
the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are
looking. THESE FEATURES, ALONG WITH OTHER VALUABLE “SIDEBAR” ITEMS, INCLUDING
ADVERTISEMENTS, MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE ON ALL MOBILE DEVICES. CHECK THEM OUT ON YOUR DESKTOP OR LAPTOP
COMPUTERS.
HOW TO FORWARD
POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for
that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the
envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below,
enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.
You might also want to let me know their Email
address so that they may be alerted to future postings.
Jack Lippman
No comments:
Post a Comment