A Message to My Friends at MSNBC and CNN
MSNBC's Rachel Maddow |
I
watch cable news channels on TV quite a bit.
I mostly watch MSNBC but I don’t neglect CNN either. I even tune into Fox to see what those with
whom I generally disagree are saying.
But really, it’s the guys and gals with whom I agree that I want to
address right now!
You guys don’t get it!
Of
course, Donald Trump tells lies. All the
time, and the documentation is there. He
breaks the law all the time and the evidence is right there. His hotel in Washington is a good
example. His financial history is a
disaster, an epitome of failure and finagling, and he has good reason to hide
his tax returns because they would reveal, if open to public scrutiny, what a
scoundrel he is. New York State is
investigating his foundation which they believe to be crooked. He had no respect for women, is an admitted
adulterer and is semi-literate. He
doesn’t read books nor newspapers and a close investigation of his alleged
academic history would probably cause both Fordham and the University of
Pennsylvania to hide their heads in shame.
He spells like a fifth grader and probably is a lousy golfer too,
despite all the time he spends on the course. Probably one “mulligan” per
hole.
He insulted his Republican
competitors for the presidential nomination and he daily insults those with
whom he disagrees. He demeans the office
of the President during all his waking hours.
Foreign heads of state consider him, as do many of those with whom he
works, to be a boor, an idiot, a moron or worse. Take your choice. Some of his erstwhile
colleagues, to get a better deal for themselves, are now willing to “cop a
plea” and talk about his dark past. In
future years, we might learn what his current wife thinks of him. She’ll probably write a book. He is like the carnival barker convincing the
rubes to plunk down their money to come into the darkened tent to see the
two-headed dog. That’s his skill
level. He also claims to be good in bed.
But
you know all of that, don’t you? And you
all talk about it incessantly and bring on panels of experts who agree that
he’s the worst President we’ve ever had and is destroying democracy in our
country. Hey, I agree with you.
What you don’t get is the reason why Donald Trump was legally
elected to the Presidency of the United States! If Russia gamed social media on the internet
to help in accomplishing that, it is only because there were enough Americans
out there ready to believe whatever misleading information was fed into their
eyes and ears, and the Russians weren’t the only people doing that. We have our own domestic charlatans, like the
low life who claim on the sewer of talk radio that the Newtown massacre was
staged. And people believe them. You and I know that the moon is not made of
green cheese, but there are many who aren’t so sure about that, and if someone
with a phony authoritative label says that it really is, enough of them believe
it and that “enough number” is sufficient to change history.
Down
deep, many Americans dislike people of color (all colors), immigrants and those
who talk and look and pray differently.
Really, they are afraid of them and fear they may end up with what they
themselves already possess, of which there isn’t quite enough, in their little
minds, to go around. Some are still
fighting the Civil War. They say they love their freedom and liberty, great
words for Americans since 1776. But they
take that freedom and liberty to mean they are free to do any damn thing they
want, and any government which tries to put a lid on that or take money out of
their pocket to help those damn immigrants and lazy descendants of slaves, is
no good. And that goes for taking away
guns too!
Wayne |
But you guys don’t get it.
All
you’re doing is preaching to the choir.
You can never convince these people to change. The Republicans have
proven themselves to be scared stiff of them, knowing that if they acknowledged
the truth about the President, the real truths you talk about every day, these
folks would replace them in an instant with someone who was a true believer in
all that phony baloney stuff about freedom and liberty in which they believe. It happened to Congressman Mark Sandford from South Carolina.
Years
of watching junk on TV, attending dumbed-down schools, going to supposed
colleges where learning is secondary to football and partying, listening to
Rush Limbaugh (who has more followers than you have viewers), going to houses
of worship which are sometimes more businesses than churches, and constantly
looking back, never forward, have made them that way. And anyone who disagrees with them is an
elitist or a globalist, which to them is un-American.
They talk a good game about the Constitution,
but none of them have ever read it, and if they did, they wouldn’t understand
it. They equate anything “government”
does with socialism or communism (they don’t know the difference) where the
government supposedly owns everything and as one of their prophets once said,
agree that it should be drowned in a bathtub.
Private is good. Public is
bad. Smells of those “other” people. Just look who is behind the counter in those
government offices. That they understand.
But I still don’t think you guys and gals get it. You’re
beating your heads against the wall.
America has turned into a country which doesn’t have the brains to
function as a democracy any longer. That Donald Trump is not wearing an orange
suit in a jail somewhere is proof of that! I guess he had better lawyers than his son-in-law's father.
If
by some miracle, the Democrats win the House of Representatives in November
(the Senate would be too much to hope for), a lot of these issues will come to
a head. Resolving them peacefully, so long as Trump is still President, will be
difficult. I hope there is no bloodshed
and that any revolution we have will be within the framework of the
Constitution of the United States.
Jack Lippman
Newspapers
I grew up reading at least one newspaper every day. My
father brought the Newark Evening News
home from work every evening and it was read from cover to cover. Occasionally, the late-night edition of the
next morning’s New York Daily Mirror
or the morning Newark Star Ledger
found their way into our home, but that was it.
Radio news was no more than headlines and TV didn’t exist then. (Of these papers, only the Star Ledger survives today.)
Today,
most people get their news from TV or the internet. Neither can hold a candle to the in-depth
coverage, and the local, national and world-wide scope of news provided by most
newspapers today. But one need not read
the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal nor the Washington Post to keep up with what is
occurring.
Good
local papers (I have subscribed to the Palm Beach Post for eighteen years)
provide you with more information than you can handle on any day of the week. And I haven’t even mentioned (of course, I now will) the mental exercise provided by the crosswords and other puzzles plus the insights provided by the comic strips, many of which, such as Doonesbury, Dilbert and Non-Sequitur, are aimed at adults.
provide you with more information than you can handle on any day of the week. And I haven’t even mentioned (of course, I now will) the mental exercise provided by the crosswords and other puzzles plus the insights provided by the comic strips, many of which, such as Doonesbury, Dilbert and Non-Sequitur, are aimed at adults.
I guarantee you that anyone who sits down with a good local paper, like
the Post, and spends thirty minutes
reading it while sipping their morning coffee, will be better informed than someone
who gets their daily news fix from the internet or any cable news channel or
even worse, the “regular” TV channels which like radio in the old days, offer
little more than headlines, without any depth.
Read books, read magazines but
most importantly, read a good newspaper every day.
Once you get the habit, you’ll recognize how little those who don’t read
a daily newspaper really know and understand.
And to borrow a biblical injunction (Deuteronomy
11:19 ), “teach this to your
children.”
JL
Health Care is the Key to Solving Economic Problems
Back in 2009, I included this original piece in an early
posting of this blog. We were going into
a recession at that time, brought about by an unregulated Wall Street investing
in sub-prime mortgage-based derivatives.
Barack Obama’s economic policies rescued failing banks and insurers from
disaster and saved us from an even worse economic crisis at the time. This piece shows how little things have
changed since then. This was written in
2009.
The
more I look at our economic crisis, the more I am convinced that the cost of
health care is at its core. We do not
have enough jobs in this country to provide our workers with the money they
must spend, as consumers, to nourish our economy. No jobs, no money, no consuming, retail
stores close, service businesses close, the few remaining manufacturers close,
more people are laid off … and bingo, the economy is destroyed.
This
vicious cycle starts with the lack of jobs and considering that our workers
compete with workers all over the world, there is no reason why any sane
businessman would offer a job calling for a benefit package including health
care to an American worker when he could hire a worker somewhere else in our
global economy for whom he does not have to provide that benefit. That explains the lack of jobs in this
country.
Okay
then, if employers are to be relieved of providing health care (and other
benefits) to American workers in order for the cost of labor in the U.S.A. to
be competitive with the rest of the globe, who then is going to provide it?
Well,
workers pay for their own homeowners or renters’ insurance, their own life
insurance to protect their families, their own automobile insurance so why
shouldn’t they pay for their own health insurance? The answer is simple: life insurance is a wise investment, but not
a necessity… automobile insurance is required if you own a car, but you can
always rely on public transportation and you can do without homeowners or
renters’ insurance, moving in with a friend or relative and getting clothing at
the Goodwill Store if your home burns down.
But the alternative to having health insurance is untreated sicknesses
or death or turning to the government for help.
Because we are talking about employed people, hopefully with decent jobs
(which they were able to get only because their employer ditched his health
insurance program, thereby remaining competitive), we are not talking about
dumping them into the Medicaid program. And today, our government is not
financially set up to provide the health insurance American employers must stop
providing to employees if they are to remain competitive. (Chinese employers, incidentally, do not
provide health insurance for their workers and surprisingly, their government
does not either. The responsibility is
shifted to the family! That is one of
the reasons the cost of labor is low there.)
So
long as health insurance is tied to employment (as it has been in this country
since World War Two), that arrangement should be disturbed as little as
possible. The employer, however, should
be reimbursed by the government for providing any such health insurance. If an employer does not provide health
insurance or if the worker is “self-employed,” access to one of the established
government health insurance programs (Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans’
Administration, Government employee plans) should be made available to these
workers. This will necessitate a tax
increase for all Americans, bringing the percentage of our income in various kinds
of taxes we pay up to the level which people pay in other Western nations. This increase, however, may be less than the
amount of money paid for health insurance by employers and individuals in this
country today.
There
will be those who will scream, “Socialism!” when ideas like these are
presented. But this is no more
socialistic than having government financed police and fire departments, public
schools and military services. I
envision a campaign involving billboards and bumper stickers asking:
WHO WILL PAY FOR YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE IF YOUR EMPLOYER
CAN’T?
Once you
stop to think about it, there is only one answer. And I hope that should even be clear to
conservatives.
JL
Feminist Dystopian Fiction or the "Handmaid" Strikes Back
Fiction
is usually more than just an interesting, often captivating, story. It can be allegorical, philosophical or political, as well as “just a
story.” Think of “Farenheit
411,” “1984,” “To Kill a Mockingbird” or even “Crime and Punishment.” Science fiction (which the first two just
mentioned are) allows the author to escape the boundaries of reality, at least
today’s reality, and soar into the realm of ideas.
In today’s world, headlines focusing on women’s rights, sexual
harassment and most recently, the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, are
inescapable. The role of women in
today’s world has become a common topic of discussion.
(One posting back, this blog discussed “sexual drive,” a not unrelated
subject.)
Lately, science fiction taking
place in a dystopian (imaginary, futuristic and unpleasant) society seems to a
tool used in addressing the question of the changing role of the sexes. Alexandra Alter, who covers publishing and
literary matters for the New York Times,
recently wrote a very interesting article on the subject, reprinted a few days
later in the Palm Beach Post. Plan to spend a few minutes reading this
article and much more time reading and discussing the books she mentions. This is important stuff! Start by clicking RIGHT HERE.
JL
Weather Report
An almost category five hurricane hit the Florida Gulf Coast on
Wednesday, creating
massive flooding and
bringing hurricane level winds far inland as it sped northward through Georgia
and the Carolinas, hitting places which had never experienced anything like it
before. This was an major emergency, but not a
big enough one to warrant the immediate attention of the P.O.S. (see earlier blogs for what these
letters stand for, but here’s a clue … the first word is “piece.”) occupying
the White House who was busy heading for a rally in
Pennsylvania to speak to his loyal followers there. A good campaigner, a terrible President, he
really couldn’t care less. Nor could his
gullible, stupid and deplorable (there I said it!) base which is carefully
described in the lead article on this posting.
We don’t have to relive Roman times to know what it was like as Nero
fiddled while Rome burned. At least Nero
could play the violin. All Trump can
play is golf.
JL
A Little Electioneering
Only
four states do not restore the right to vote to convicted felons after they
have served their time in prison or on probation. Florida is one of them. An Amendment (Number Four) will remedy this,
restoring the right to vote to felons who have fully paid their debt to society
(except murderers and sexual offenders).
At present, there is a circuitous and complicated procedure in effect, usually taking years to navigate and ultimately requiring the Governor’s signature which does address this situation. Understandably, only a miniscule number of felons have benefited from it. Republicans Ron DeSantis and Rick Scott, running for the governorship and for the Senate respectively, oppose this Amendment as being too lenient. That is why most thinking Floridians will be voting “Yes” on Amendment Four next month as they also make Scott and DeSantis available in the job market for any lobbying firm which wants to hire them.
At present, there is a circuitous and complicated procedure in effect, usually taking years to navigate and ultimately requiring the Governor’s signature which does address this situation. Understandably, only a miniscule number of felons have benefited from it. Republicans Ron DeSantis and Rick Scott, running for the governorship and for the Senate respectively, oppose this Amendment as being too lenient. That is why most thinking Floridians will be voting “Yes” on Amendment Four next month as they also make Scott and DeSantis available in the job market for any lobbying firm which wants to hire them.
JL
A Little Geopolitics
Since
the demise of the Ottoman Empire after World War One, there has been a conflict
among Muslims as to who would be the dominant Islamic power in the Middle East. Would it be the extremist Shia Muslims
centered in the land that was ancient Persia or would it be the Sunni Muslims,
everywhere else in the Middle East, but becoming increasingly dominated by the
influence of the extremist Wahabi clergy on the Arabian peninsula?
The
Persians, or Iran, at least had a historic identification with “nationhood.” The others were no more than Arab nomads,
with no basis for a common identity other than the artificial states, like
Saudi Arabia, which were carved out of the sand (which turned out to be
covering vast petroleum deposits) after World War One.
The
Shah was our puppet in Iran since after World War Two when we helped defeat a
Russian-backed Communist takeover there.
Shia Muslim extremists overthrew him in 1979, eradicating whatever
influence we had there, and since then, the United States has leaned more
toward friendship with the Sunni Muslims whose center of power is Saudi Arabia, a relative newcomer to the family of nations, not even existing until after World War One.
Once
one thinks beyond the religious aspects of a choice between Saudi Arabia and
Iran, it becomes clear that the Persian people of Iran are more
western-oriented than the Arabs throughout the rest of the Middle East, still
evolving from their nomadic state of a century ago. But Iran’s extremist leadership, their
expansionist plans, their hostility toward Israel and their nuclear ambitions
clearly make a normal relationship with Iran impossible for the United States
at present. This leaves us with the
Arabs as our best Muslim friends in the Middle East. Even Israel favors them over Iran. Few remember that prior to 1979, Israel was
actually more friendly with Iran, even arming them in their war with Iraq!
Similarly,
prior to 1979, Iran had a closer relationship with the United States than any
other state in the Middle East did, excluding Israel. Indeed, this was advantageous to us because
the geographic position of Iran served as a buffer between Russia, always
looking for an outlet to the sea, and the Middle East. Right now, Iran and Russia are uncomfortably
close politically, to our disadvantage.
Khashoggi |
But
Middle East alliances, economic and political, are not permanent nor immutable
things. Everything is always in
flux. Russia, Syria, Israel, Saudi
Arabia, Turkey and the rest of the Middle East are involved in intertwining and
changing relationships, which ultimately affect these nations’ relationships
with the United States. It is not
inconceivable that someday our Muslim friends in the Middle East will be in
Teheran, once the extremist Shia clergy lose power there, which they someday
will, and reduced worldwide dependence upon petroleum has left the Saudis as
just a desert kingdom run by a family of extremely wealthy nomads.
JL
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO
FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email
every time a new posting appears. If you wish to be added to that
Email list, just let me know by sending me an email at Riart1@aol.com.
HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACKSPOTPOURRI.com
Contact me by email at Riart1@aol.com. YOU ALSO
CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR
COMMENTS AT THAT ADDRESS. (Comments can also be made by clicking on the
"Post a Comment" link at the blog's end, though few followers of the
blog have done that lately.)
MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO
AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?
HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the
appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right or
scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this
posting. The “Search Box” in the right side of
the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are
looking.
HOW TO FORWARD
POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for
that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the
envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below,
enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.
You might also want to let me know their Email
address so that they may be alerted to future postings.
Jack Lippman
No comments:
Post a Comment