Thank you for visiting JACKSPOTPOURRI -
Politics - Satire - Economics - Media - Creativity! My Blog and Yours as Well. YOUR ideas, poetry, stories,
political thoughts and essays are welcome. Send them to the blog at Riart1@aol.com. For more information about the blog, check out the instructions at the very end of
IF YOU LIKE WHAT YOU READ HERE, PLEASE PASS IT ON TO OTHERS! The address: www.jackspotpourri.com
Tuesday, March 29, 2016
Liberty Versus Security, "It Can't Happen Here" ... But It Did, "Labor Omnia Vincet" and David Brooks' Thoughts on Aging
*Labor Omnia Vincet - That Good Place
A big factor resulting in the Republican base being dominated in 2016 by angry
middle class working people is their dissatisfaction with a system which they
feel has shortchanged them.These are
the folks who are turning to Donald Trump for a solution. On the Democratic
side, the unexpectedly large number of supporters Bernie Sanders has amassed
manifests the same thing.So this is not
a Republican or a Democratic response.It is an American response.
Primarily, this dissatisfaction arises from what has happened to the
job market in this country.Wages, when
considered along with the rest of the economy, have actually gone down over the
years.Jobs which used to be plentiful
have disappeared and have been replaced to an extent by new kinds of employment,
with most job creation occurring at the lower and upper levels and few in “the
middle” and which seems to be constantly evolving and changing, making
retraining difficult. The computer programming a displaced coal miner or textile worker learned
last year may be obsolete today.Finally, the idea of a job lasting for an employee’s entire career has
changes, once a sign of personal instability for most people, are now the rule, with companies
themselves even losing the permanence they once had.All of this has enormous implications for such things as health care,
home purchasing, paying for education and retirement planning as well as public
attitudes toward immigration.
This dissatisfaction comes down to the question
of who is looking out for the welfare of the working class. I'll repeat that. This dissatisfaction comes down to the question of who is looking out for the welfare of the working class. Individual workers cannot do it by themselves
nor can politicians, regardless of what they may say. Faith in Trump or Cruz to right such inequities is misplaced. If there are solutions to be found, they must
found by a cooperative, joint effort.From the late nineteenth until the middle of the twentieth
centuries, labor unions filled this need.Now, the unions, except in the area of
government employees, are weak if not non-existent.
Samuel Gomphers, labor leader in the late nineteenth century and founder of the A.F. of L. started by unionizing the cigar makers in Tampa.
Certainly, this cannot be blamed on the Democratic Party, which has
always had a strong pro-labor union position.It is the Republicans who have fought the unions
with attacks on the National Labor Relations Board, promoting state right-to-work
laws and other union-busting activities.It is the business community which has moved its manufacturing overseas
where inexpensive, overworked low cost labor is available to replace the good
and more expensive jobs which labor unions had brought to the American working
person.And generally, this business
community has supported the Republican Party which in exchange, has favored it
from trade and taxation standpoints.
jobs go overseas and wages drop here
So when dissatisfied, angry middle class
working people look for someone to blame for the difficult economic challenges
they face, the culprit stands before them.It is the Republican
Party.They have never been the
friend of working people.And that
includes former film union leader Ronald Reagan who, like the Pied Piper of
Hamelin, led America down the wrong fork in the road leading to mythological “trickle
down” economics. They have decimated the protector of
the working person, labor unions. Blame them, folks! Not Barack Obama! Rather than continue to
support the G.O.P., hoping that the dangerous and hollow oratory of their two leading candidates for the nomination will change things, dissatisfied
middle class working people would be better served by organizing and supporting
labor unions and their allies in the Democratic Party.That good place always was and should be the home of
the working person.
*My Latin isn’t particularly
good but “Labor Omnia Vincet” can be taken to mean that “hard work will solve
all problems” or that the Labor Union movement will ultimately triumph over all.Some unions have it in their seals and it
happens to be the State motto of Oklahoma, where obviously, it refers to “hard
work” and not to Unions.
Liberty Versus Security
There has always been a problem in achieving a balance between liberty
and security. Back in feudal times,
serfs sacrificed their freedom in exchange for the protection of the nobles who
guaranteed their safety by providing them with security from attacks by any
marauders from the manor down the road.
In Feudal Times
In times of war, personal liberties are often temporarily sacrificed in
exchange for the ability to more effectively fight an enemy, with the national
good as the overriding objective.
Right now, in combating terrorism, here and abroad, we are asked to sacrifice liberty by enabling our government to invade our individual right to privacy, including electronic communications. Initially, it would seem that it
is not too big a price to pay for increased security. But really, it is the same as giving someone
the okay to slit open and examine the contents of any envelope which the
postman leaves in your mailbox, including love letters, business correspondence
and dunning letters from creditors, the kind of things about which you might
not want others to know. Do you really
want to do that? Despite assurances of
confidentiality, once private information is looked at, it is no longer
private. And electronic surveillance of
what happens on your cell phone or other electronic devices is no different
than such an invasion of one’s outdoor mailbox.
Someone is watching you
But if it will protect our nation’s security, is this too great a
sacrifice to make? After all, most
people have nothing to hide. In making this decision, the key is how severe and menacing
are the dangers at which such measures are directed. Certainly, acts of terrorism which can
take many lives fall into this category.
Once some privacy is given up, lessening liberty in exchange for more
security, it is vital that it not be made the norm, and provision made to
restore liberties which were given up, once the crisis calling for such
measures is resolved. And any government
which acts in this manner should do so reluctantly, only with the acquiescence
of the people, and with no intention of giving permanence to any authoritarian
steps it may temporarily take to achieve its aims.