About Me

My photo
BOYNTON BEACH, FL, United States
Jack is a graduate of Rutgers University where he majored in history. His career in the life and health insurance industry involved medical risk selection and brokerage management. Retired in Florida since 2001 after many years in NJ and NY, widowed since 2010, he occasionally writes, paints, plays poker, participates in play readings and is catching up on Shakespeare, Melville and Joyce, etc.

Monday, February 9, 2015

The President's Word Games, the Writers' Group Resurrected and Down with "Foodies"


                                               File:Lilyu's turtle.svg

Word Games

https://scottystarnes.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/obama-confused1.jpg

President Obama sometimes plays games with the English language.  Lately, the Administration has been facing the problems created by Russia’s aggressive support of rebels in the eastern part of the Ukraine.  While the French and the Germans have been working with the Ukrainian government to try to come up with some sort of diplomatic approach to use in talking to Vladimir Putin, the United States is wondering whether it should supply arms to the Ukrainians.  Rather than referring to such arms as “weapons,” the President has consistently been using the phrase, “lethal weapons.”  This leads me to wonder if President Obama knows of a category of weaponry in our arsenals which is not “lethal.” (If we do, why are we spending money on them?) Do we have a store of water pistols, which the President wants to make clear would not be sent to the Ukraine because they aren’t “lethal.”  Or is he just using “lethal” as a word to frighten the Russians. 

Another usage which piques my curiosity is our government’s consistently referring to the Islamic State as ISIL.  Everybody else calls them ISIS, the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.”  ISIL, on the other hand translates as the “Islamic State in the Levant.” 

The Levant is an old term used to describe the area north of the Arabian Peninsula, south of Turkey, west of Iran and stretching to the Mediterranean Sea.  Using it enables the President to refer to the Islamic State without getting into the political mish-mash which Syria and Iraq present, and short-changing other Middle East nations, such as Jordan, and of course the Kurds in northern Iraq, also threatened by the Islamic State by leaving them out.  Certainly, the Islamic State’s stated goals extend beyond Iraq and Syria, so it probably is a more accurate term.  Nevertheless, nobody other than Barack Obama, John Kerry and their spokespersons use it.
Jack Lippman 

                                             File:Lilyu's turtle.svg
 Writers' Group Resurrected
Some of the short stories appearing on the blog written by myself, and in the past by the late Sid Bolotin, came from the old Writers' Group at Cascade Lakes in Boynton Beach, Florida.   Well, the group has been resurrected, and is producing stories  once again.  Some of them, by myself as well as by others, will be appearing on this blog. Here is one of them.


A Bowler’s Story

Jack Lippman

2014 was a remarkable year for Ted.  It saw him bowl a “300” game and it also witnessed the dissolution of his marriage.  But let’s start at the beginning with what happened that memorable April evening at Sunset Lanes.

Ted and his three teammates on the Formidable Foursome were the worst team in the Thursday Night Men’s league, languishing in last place.  On a good night, and there weren’t too many of them, Ted and his buddies struggled to maintain their averages which ranged from 140 to 160.  But that evening, something miraculous happened.  Mort bowled a 640 three-game series, Joe bowled a 650 series, Lou bowled a 660 series and Ted bowled an unbelievable 790 series, highlighted by a brilliant 300 game, consisting of a dozen solid strikes in a row!  Actually, every single one of the games the four teammates bowled that evening was over 200!  It was quite a night, and their opponents, the first place Grizzlies, while no match for Ted’s team that night, bowled their usual high scores too.  It was the rare frame that evening that didn’t produce a strike for any of the bowlers on either team. 

                                      http://c3333154.r54.cf0.rackcdn.com/viz-a-ball/bowling-balls/500/300-game-spare-ball-9729.jpg

As a result of this, the competition between the Formidable Foursome and the Grizzlies was wrapped up by nine o’clock, at least an hour and a half earlier than the usual time Ted and his teammates usually finished their bowling.  A game consisting of a lot of frames where two balls are thrown takes quite a bit longer than a game where most of the time all ten pins go down on the first ball thrown as was the case that evening.

After a quick celebratory beer, all four men piled into Lou’s car, whose turn it was to drive that week.  Ten minutes later, Ted was home, and skipping the elevator, he joyfully ran up the stairs to his second floor condo.

“Fran, Fran,” he called out.  “Guess what? I bowled a 300 game tonight!”

Her shrill voice responded sharply from the bedroom, “What are you doing home so early, Ted?  You usually get in about ten-thirty on bowling nights.  Why so early?   Give me a minute while I put on a robe.  I was sound asleep when you came in.”

“Never mind that, Frannie.  We’re gonna celebrate!  Stay just the way you are in bed!  I’m really on a high tonight, and I have no intention of letting it deflate!”  And with that, Ted pushed open the door to the bedroom, and saw his naked wife standing in front of an open window holding up a bed sheet in front of her and trying to block his view of the window. “What the fuck is going on?” Ted screamed.

Shoving his wife out of the way, all Ted was able to see were two legs culminating in two bare feet gingerly exiting the window in an effort to reach the pavement below as quickly as possible.

Falling from the second story window, Ted’s oldest friend, Bill, with whom both he and Fran had maintained a friendship since high school days, valiantly tried to twist and spin so that he might land on his feet, or even on his butt.  Unfortunately, he wasn’t successful and landed head first, splitting his skull wide open on the concrete.  When the EMTs arrived at the hospital with him, he was already dead.

Ted wouldn’t forgive Fran for cheating on him, moved out, saw a lawyer and is waiting for the courts to finalize the divorce.  Although not a religious person, he occasionally wonders if the unbelievable performance of the Formidable Foursome that evening might not have been some sort of act of God intended to get him home in time to uncover his wife’s infidelity.  And as for their new-found bowling prowess, the team remains in last place in the league and Ted hasn’t bowled better than 175 since his 300 game. He probably never will.


                                                     File:Lilyu's turtle.svg
Foodies Versus Good Health
Wikepedia tells us that a foodie is a gourmet, or a person who has an ardent or refined interest in food and alcoholic beverages. A foodie seeks new food experiences as a hobby rather than simply eating out of convenience or hunger. 


We live in a society which seems to cater to foodies.  Take a look at the articles in local newspapers and national magazines devoted to the latest creations of famous (and less renowned) chefs as well as recipes for preparation of adventuresome foods and desserts at home. Publications have food editors and food critics who fill the sections devoted to food and drink with their opinions, and usually, mouth-watering color pictures.   Watch all of this on TV as well, where there is a 24/7 channel devoted to food and nothing else.  Paula Deen has a magazine, writes articles and is on TV touting delicious fat-filled fried food that will put you in the grave earlier than you normally would be getting there.


Is all of this healthy?   Shouldn’t the emphasis be on providing all of the necessary foods we need each day within a reasonable amount of calorie intake.  Sweet things taste wonderful, but do we really need them in the quantities they are available?  Look at the increased appearance of adult onset diabetes.  Neither is health enhanced by the increased use of preservatives added to make food last longer and biological agents used in food manufacturing, agriculture and animal feed.  



Fried foods, food with high fat content, foods containing a lot of salt all combine to do no good for the cardiovascular system.  But they do make food, particularly in restaurants, taste wonderful.  A few years back, the late Robert Cummings, actor and advocate of healthy eating, suggested that we’d be better off not eating anything that was “white.”  While this is extreme, it is a good idea to watch your intake of bleached flour and things made from it, like white bread and cake, as well as salt, sugar and eggs. 

 
Take a look at the snack aisle in your local supermarket.   Bag after bag of chips and pretzels, in an almost infinite series of incarnations line the aisle.  Most of it is heavily salted and high in fat content.  Tremendous amounts of this junk are consumed in front of the nation’s TV sets, washed down with sugar-laden soda (and diet drinks are little better) each day.  We are committing suicide in that snack aisle.

I saw an article in the food section of the paper recently about a bar that was featuring a martini garnished with … bacon!  I’m sure a lot of “foodies” have tried it.
                                     


There is plenty of information out there on how to eat properly.  You can start out on the internet by finding out how many calories a day you should consume. You can do this by clicking on  http://www.calorieking.com/interactive-tools/how-many-calories-should-you-eat/?ref=nav  If it doesn't work for you, just copy and paste the link on your browser line.  (Nowadays, most foods have labels with calorie and ingredient information to help you do this.)  

America’s health depends on our giving eating properly a higher priority than the “foodies’ and fast food dispensers who dominate our culture have assigned it.   Once you start down this path, it is just a matter of maintaining the discipline needed to eat properly.
JL
                                                           File:Lilyu's turtle.svg                                   
HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email every time a new posting appears.  If you wish to be added to that Email list, just let me know by clicking on Riart1@aol.com and sending me an Email.  

HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACK'S POTPOURRI. 
BY CLICKING ON THAT SAME ADDRESS, Riart1@aol.com   YOU ALSO CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR COMMENTS.  (Comments can also be made by clicking on the "Post a Comment" link at the blog's end.)

MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?   

HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.                                                
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right, or scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this posting.  The “Search Box” in the right side of the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are looking.

HOW TO FORWARD POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below, enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.  You might also want to let me know their Email address so that they may be alerted to future postings.


Jack Lippman 



Monday, February 2, 2015

Dancing in the Dark, Politics and Haiku

Dancing in the Dark
There are two memorable songs bearing the title, “Dancing in the Dark,” and the one that comes to mind when the song is mentioned is a wonderful clue as to the generation to which you belong. 
 
Back in 1931, composer Arthur Schwartz (father of pianist and occasional radio personality Jonathan Schwartz) and lyricist Howard Dietz wrote “Dancing in the Dark” for a Broadway review, “The Band Wagon” which was revived 22 years later.  The song (“Dancing in the dark, till the tune ends, we’re dancing in the dark, and it soon ends …”) is an integral part of what is called the Great American Songbook, filled with the music of Gershwin, Porter, Kahn, and Rodgers and the lyrics of Hart and Hammerstein, among other greats.  This particular “Dancing in the Dark,” I believe will be with us for a very, very long time.

The other “Dancing in the Dark” was part of Bruce Springsteen’s 1984 album, “Born in the USA,” with words and music by Springsteen himself.  It sold over a million “singles” and was Springsteen’s greatest hit.  You probably are at least familiar with the chorus which starts out bemoaning the fact that “You can't start a fire, you can't start a fire without a spark, this gun's for hire even if we're just dancing in the dark.”   I believe this song will also be with us for a very, very long time, but not so long as the original 1931 “Dancing in the Dark” will be.

Insofar as I can determine, for those born prior to the mid 1960's, the mention of a song called “Dancing in the Dark” brings to mind the Arthur Schwartz song.  If you first saw the light of day after that time though, the Springsteen song is the one you probably associate with the title.  In fact, many who recognize one version usually don’t even know that the other one exists.

You can hear Arthur Schwartz' "Dancing in the Dark" sung by Frank Sinatra by visiting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGQ0IMdQcnY  and you can hear Bruce Springsteen's version at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=129kuDCQtHs .

 
A Middle Aged Sinatra and a Youthful Springsteen


(I tried to download both videos onto the blog but it looked like it would take a few hours to do on my antiquated computer, so if you want to view and listen to them, just click on the links, or if that doesn't work, copy and paste them on your browser line.)

Which do you like better?   Frank or Bruce?   It really doesn't matter since both singers are from New Jersey .... only from different generations!

Jack Lippman
                             

Politics - Ya Can't Get Away From It
Now that Mitt Romney has bowed out of the Republican race for the 2016 G.O.P. nomination for the Presidency, it looks like a circus, featuring a clown of the week  …  as happened in 2012 …  will ensue.  

Does any responsible Republican really think that Marco Rubio or Mike Huckabee is qualified to sit in the White House?  Republicans are afraid of Chris Christie’s  petulance, wary of where Jeb Bush stands on anything (hasn’t held office in ten years and seems to be too liberal on immigration and education),  confused by Rand Paul’s neo-isolationism and surprised that Scott Walker is drawing significant support.  That comes from the fact that he successfully stood up to unions and teachers in his home state, but what else has he done, to qualify him for the White House?  (and don't answer that by asking me what did a "community organizer/lawyer" in his first term in the Senate do to qualify him for that same job.)

Scott Walker
Wisconsin's Walker                               

Only Bush and possibly Christie have access to the kind of money needed to run a campaign, but that can change if wealthy donors, such as the Koch brothers, choose to back someone else.  That’s what that meeting in Iowa two weeks ago was all about.  I heard former New York Governor George Pataki on TV this morning say he was available for a Presidential run.  Who is he kidding?  But that serves to show how wide open the race is.  

The task is to find a well-financed Republican who is conservative enough to satisfy those who do not view domestic and foreign policy through the windshield but rather through the rear view mirror.  If they find such a candidate, he will also have to have the desire and ability to govern, which means facing the economic realities of fiscal and monetary policy, world peace, terrorism and keeping Americans working and healthy.  All of this will be difficult if the G.O.P. commits itself to running government on the cheap. (That means “tax reduction” as a way of benefiting the wealthy who will then have more money to invest in a growing economy, which will produce more income to be taxed, albeit at a lower rate.  Seems we’ve heard that story before, but it never seems to work out that way. )

I met a Republican the other day who said that the United States was far behind the rest of the world insofar as cybersecurity is concerned.  “Their hackers,” he said, “are better than our hackers.”   He attributed this to our not spending enough money on cybersecurity, which he saw as the fault of the Democrats who controlled the Senate and the White House.  “Let’s see if the Republicans, now in charge of both Houses of Congress,” I responded, “will be willing to spend the money to get the job done right.”

JL
                    
                                 
Try Some Haiku
Haiku is a form of Japanese poetry, usually dealing with events seen or found in nature, consisting of three lines.  The first and third lines contain five syllables and the second line contains seven syllables.  Rhyming is unnecessary, but the words should be soothing with the third line suggesting a contrast to what came before it. 
Try writing some.  Doing so has a calming effect, relieving stress.  I just  came up with these two samples.  You can too.  Your haiku will appear on this blog if you care to submit it.

http://www.suspendedlogic.com/images/20100102232227_snow_branch.jpg
Snowflakes on branches
Rest atop one another
Until the limb cracks.


 http://soraza.ru/to/35/cvetok_vetochki_butony_vetka_cvetochek_abrikos_prev.jpg
Warm winds caressing
Closed and sleeping blossom buds
Often wake them up.


JL                               


HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email every time a new posting appears.  If you wish to be added to that Email list, just let me know by clicking on Riart1@aol.com and sending me an Email.  

HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACK'S POTPOURRI. 
BY CLICKING ON THAT SAME ADDRESS, Riart1@aol.com   YOU ALSO CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR COMMENTS.  (Comments can also be made by clicking on the "Post a Comment" link at the blog's end.)

MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?   

HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.                                                
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right, or scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this posting.  The “Search Box” in the right side of the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are looking.

HOW TO FORWARD POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below, enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.  You might also want to let me know their Email address so that they may be alerted to future postings.


Jack Lippman 

Monday, January 26, 2015

The Middle East, Felix Mendelssohn - Money, Free Speech, Corporations and People


                                             



Diplomacy in the Middle East
Is it with longing that the world looks back to the Ottoman Empire which, until the First World War, maintained a loose but relatively effective control over much of the tribal Middle East which up until then was without independent nation-states.  Their religiously-based Caliphate was benign and when rebellion raised its head, it was quickly put down.

Map of Middle East

It is an understatement to say that the nations which succeeded the Ottoman Empire are in disarray.  There is unbridled violence stemming from the historic schism between Sunni and Shiite believers in Islam, and even polarities within those branches.  Compounding this is the emergence of anti-Western, anti-Israel, violent extremism.  Right now, there are at least four “failed” nations in the Middle East, places which were far better under the heel of the Turkish Ottomans than as independent countries.  These are Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.  With a geographic stretch, one might include Libya and Somalia in this group.

How long nations such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and the Gulf States remain viable is questionable. Turkey and Egypt present much more stability, but they are far from being democratic states, and without despotism, their long-term survival is uncertain.

Israel, child of the United Nations in 1947, and with a historic precedent for its existence, is strong proof that successful nationhood in the Middle East is possible.  The Israelis have made a prosperous, technologically advanced and self-sufficient nation out of worthless desert wasteland and should be an example to the rest of the Middle East, which spends too much of its energy trying to destroy Israel rather than trying to emulate it, which would solve most of their problems.

Attempting to deal with the Middle East means approaching problems which exist separately, and in combination with one another.  The old adage that the enemy of your enemy might be your ally pervades Middle Eastern politics.  If one were to make a list of all the players in the Middle East and note who the enemies of each were, you would see what makes diplomacy there so difficult.   

For example, everyone knows that the United States and the European nations are opposed to the jihadist Sunni anti-Western Islamic State.  But so is Shia Iran, particularly in Iraq where ISIS is attempting to seize the entire country and in Syria where the ISIS would love to overthrow Bashir al Assad. But hold on, the United States and the West would just as well like to see him go!  But Iran supports al Assad’s government.  It is inconceivable that we would ally ourselves with the Islamic State in opposing al Assad and Iran, but it is also inconceivable that we would ally ourselves with Iran in opposing the Islamic State so long as Iran is supporting Bashir and its Hezbollah proxies in Syria and Lebanon, not to speak of Tehran's support of Hamas in Gaza.

Image result for assad

Assad

The same kinds of scenarios can be drawn involving Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Jordan, Yemen, the Al Qaeda group, the Palestinians, Libya, Somalia, Egypt and Turkey.  Diplomacy is tough stuff.  And war has been defined as what happens when diplomacy fails, and up to now, "failure" has been the default position in regard to diplomacy in the Middle East.
Jack Lippman

                                                  

Felix Mendelssohn's Venture into Klezmer

Mendelssohn

I recently had the pleasure of hearing the Budapest Festival Orchestra, one of the world’s finest musical groups, perform Felix Mendelssohn’s Overture and Incidental Music for Shakespeare’s play, “A Midsummer Night’s Dream.”  I believe that of the fifteen pieces of “incidental” music Mendelssohn had composed for the piece, only about eight or ten are usually performed, the most famous of which of course is the Wedding March.  Last week, the conductor, however, chose to include two of the rarely played pieces.  The inclusion of one was, at least to me, very significant.

Mendelssohn was Jewish.  In order to succeed in his chosen field in Nineteenth century Germany, however, he felt it necessary to convert to *Christianity.  (His very talented sister, Fannie, remained Jewish and never achieved the fame that Felix did.)  But apparently, a bit of his Jewish heritage remained and it appears in one of those rarely played pieces of incidental music.  It was intended as background, or introductory music, for the scene in the play where a ridiculous and nonsensical version of the classic love story of Pyramus and Thisbe is presented.  This piece of Mendelssohn’s music is in the style of Klezmer musicians playing a "frailach" (Jewish "happy" music) at a wedding, including a clarinet solo reminiscent of Artie Shaw. The Budapest’s conductor, Ivan Fischer, made sure that Mendelssohn’s Jewish roots were not ignored.

*(Mendelssohn’s  devotion to Christianity might be attested to by the fact that among his compositions is included the Christmas carol, “Hark, the Herald Angels Sing.”)


JL

                                                      

An Issue for 2016
In all likelihood, whomever is elected President in 2016 will have the opportunity to appoint one or more Supreme Court Justices.  Several of those on the bench currently are aging.  If the Senate goes the same way as the Presidency in 2016, there will be less need for compromise in the choice of new Justices.  This very well be one of the most important outcomes of the 2016 elections, for which campaigning has already begun. 

The 2010 Citizens United decision, which extended the right of free speech to corporations, and earlier decisions which equated money with free speech, have had a tremendous effect on our election campaigns.  A recent Op-Ed article in the Palm Beach Post, reproduced below, discusses this extension of the right of free speech.  It will be interesting to see if any of the candidates for the Democratic nomination, if there are any other than Hillary Clinton, have this subject on their agenda.  I do not suspect that any Republicans will.
JL


Campaign finance ruling has lasting effect

Amanda Hollis-Brusky

   Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission turns 5 this month, but the damage from the U.S. Supreme Court’s revolutionary ruling on campaign finance is just beginning to be felt.    Scholars and pundits will undoubtedly mark the anniversary with commentary on such issues as the troubling rise of “super PACs” and the proliferation of undisclosed contributions known as “dark money.” The biggest long-term impact, however, is the powerful framing effect the decision has had on other areas of the law.

   With last year’s decision in Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby Stores, the idea that “corporations are people” has spread from campaign finance law into the sphere of religious liberty. And there is no reason to believe it will stop there.

   In our legal system, the way an issue is first framed can have powerful and long-lasting consequences. Gordon Silverstein, assistant dean at Yale Law School, has described law as a game of Scrabble — the first tiles placed on the board limit the future moves of the other players. For example, in Buckley vs. Valeo (1976), the first campaign finance case of the modern era, the Supreme Court decided that “money is speech” rather than “money is property.”    Once campaign contributions were elevated to a form of political speech, election spending became increasingly difficult to regulate. Like a series of tiles on a Scrabble board, the precedent set by this one decision has determined what is politically possible and judicially permissible in the realm of campaign finance for almost 40 years.
http://carolinasistah.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/us-supreme-court.jpg
The Supreme Court:  Front (left to right): Justices Thomas, Scalia, Roberts (Chief Justice), 
Kennedy and Ginsberg.  Rear (left to right):  Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, Alito and Kagan.

   The way an issue is framed in one area of law also can wind up having dramatic effects in other areas. Savvy litigators frame their cases in the context of previous wins. In 2012, religious liberties advocates representing a for-profit corporation, Hobby Lobby, pointed to the Citizens United decision in making their case against the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate. If for-profit corporations could engage in political speech, why could they not also practice religion?

   The strategy proved to be a winning one. The U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals cited Citizens United 12 times in its Hobby Lobby decision, writing, “We see no reason the Supreme Court would recognize constitutional protection for a corporation’s political expression but not its religious expression.” The Supreme Court majority agreed and extended religious liberty protections to closely held for-profit corporations. The extension of the logic of Citizens United to Hobby Lobby was a seemingly small step. But as Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing in dissent in Hobby Lobby, warned, “The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield.”

   Minefield or not, the court didn’t venture into this place by accident. The Citizens United case came about through years of groundwork laid by conservative legal counterrevolutionaries connected through the Federalist Society — a network of 40,000 lawyers, judges and academics dedicated to reshaping the law to align with conservative and libertarian principles.
   So far, the most acute effects of the Citizens United decision have been on elections and campaigns over the last half-decade. Although these effects could be mitigated by statutes, a constitutional amendment or a future Supreme Court decision, the effect Citizens United has had on other areas of law could be longer-lasting and equally as troubling.

   Imagine the variety of ways for-profit corporations might use the “corporations are people” frame to reap additional protections and privileges under the law. Doesn’t antitrust regulation infringe on a corporate person’s freedom of association? Freedom of association is, after all, an essential part of free speech. And, as we have seen, if it can be linked to speech, the claim is at least in play on this Supreme Court’s Scrabble board.

   If past experience holds true, the logic behind the Citizens United decision will become increasingly accepted, authoritative and influential. As the late Justice Benjamin Cardozo said, “The power of precedent ... is the power of the beaten track.”

   If the Supreme Court continues to beat the Citizens United track, we can look forward to corporate “people” accruing more and more of the rights and privileges of “We the People.”



   (Amanda Hollis-Brusky, an assistant professor of politics at Pomona College in Claremont, Calif., is the author of “Ideas With Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution” to be published this month. She wrote this for the Los Angeles Times.)


                                                            

HOW TO BE ALERTED TO FUTURE BLOG POSTINGS.
Many readers of this blog are alerted by Email every time a new posting appears.  If you wish to be added to that Email list, just let me know by clicking on Riart1@aol.com and sending me an Email.  

HOW TO CONTACT ME or CONTRIBUTE MATERIAL TO JACK'S POTPOURRI. 
BY CLICKING ON THAT SAME ADDRESS, Riart1@aol.com   YOU ALSO CAN SEND ME YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS TO BE PUBLISHED IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS YOUR COMMENTS.  (Comments can also be made by clicking on the "Post a Comment" link at the blog's end.)

MOBILE DEVICE ACCESS.
DID YOU KNOW THAT www.jackspotpourri.com IS ALSO AVAILABLE ON YOUR MOBILE DEVICES IN A MODIFIED, EASY-TO-READ, FORMAT?   

HOW TO VIEW OLDER POSTINGS.                                                
To view older postings on this blog, just click on the appropriate date in the “Blog Archive” midway down the column off to the right, or scroll down until you see the “Older Posts” notation at the very bottom of this posting.  The “Search Box” in the right side of the posting also may be helpful in locating a posting topic for which you are looking.

HOW TO FORWARD POSTINGS.
To send this posting to a friend, or enemy for that matter, whom you think might be interested in it, just click on the envelope with the arrow on the "Comments" line directly below, enabling you to send them an Email providing a link directly to this posting.  You might also want to let me know their Email address so that they may be alerted to future postings.


Jack Lippman 

Monday, January 19, 2015

Extra: Latest Charlie Hebdo Cover

Here is the latest Charlie Hebdo cover that has caused Muslims in many nations to riot, and has generally not been reproduced by most Western publications out of fear of reprisal.  It is clear that many Muslims are very thin-skinned about any portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed.  Their religion prohibits it, but the problem is that only a minority of the planet's inhabitants are Muslim. Muslims should avoid publications with such pictures in them, but they have no right to insist on the worldwide suspension of freedom of expression because of their beliefs. They are free to worship as they wish, but they cannot impose their beliefs, including the forbidding of the portrayal of their prophet, on the rest of the world.  Here's the cover:
JL



Translation:  All is pardoned