About Me

My photo
BOYNTON BEACH, FL, United States
Jack is a graduate of Rutgers University where he majored in history. His career in the life and health insurance industry involved medical risk selection and brokerage management. Retired in Florida since 2001 after many years in NJ and NY, widowed since 2010, he occasionally writes, paints, plays poker, participates in play readings and is catching up on Shakespeare, Melville and Joyce, etc.

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

September 24, 2025 - Kimmel, Food Insecurity, Controlling the Press, Cost of Visas, Prosecutors Who Won't Prosecute, and More

 

Late Night Report

If Tuesday night’s Miami Marlins – Philadelphia Phillies game hadn’t experienced about an hour delay during a heavy rainstorm in Philadelphia in the ninth inning and continued  on to a Marlins victory in the eleventh inning, I would not have still been up watching TV at 11:25 p.m. when the game ended. 

But some good came of that, since Jimmy Kimmel was due to return to his regular time slot at 11:30 p.m. after ABC and Disney changed their mind about buckling under to Trump’s FCC head who had never heard of the First Amendment.
 
Kimmel


 
What the heck, of course I stayed up another half hour to watch Kimmel’s opening monologue on ABC. (In a very funny skit, Robert DeNiro played the FCC chairman). If you missed it, check it out on You Tube at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c1tjh_ZO_tY   (It's all over the internet but try for a version that runs about half an hour.)

Kimmel’s language might have been less elaborate when he spoke of the right wing’s efforts to avoid being associated with the still-unknown motivation of Kirk’s assassin, but that doesn’t matter. Even lies are allowed under the First Amendment, so long as no one is hurt by them and they are not malicious, and Kimmel was certainly most gracious in his condolence message to Kirk’s widow. 

Twenty percent of ABC’s stations, those controlled by right wing Trump loyalists like Sinclair and Nexstar, refused to carry the show, in which Kimmel didn’t hesitate to criticize the President. At best, they are an example of media sources that do not fully understand the First Amendment. 

Kimmel’s return, the result of public and media support for him, may mark a change in the unwarranted acceptance of Trump’s misuse of the presidency, to which far too many corporations, businesses, educational institutions, media sources, and law firms have spinelessly succumbed, disregarding the Constitution. I hope that change expands and continues. 

 It looks like the American people have a louder voice than the foes of our democracy. One might not agree with Kimmel, but real Americans defend his right to say what he believes. Kimmel’s return included a clip showing Texas Senator Ted Cruz, with whom Kimmel rarely agrees, making that point. 

                                                                 * * * 

And here’s what had been already scheduled to appear on Jackspotpourri today. 

Often, Jackspotpourri’s content seems to become stale from the time I type it until its appearance on the blog a few days later, but I feel that this piece by Heather Cox Richardson still is worthwhile. So here goes: 

                                                                 * * 
America’s Democracy is at Stake 

Let’s start with Professor Heather Cox Richardson’s September 22 ‘Letters From an America’ posting (released the preceding evening). You might not bother with a link so here it is verbatim. Every word is included.

It's very frightening stuff! What’s at stake? America’s democracy! (I’ve used some color in a few places for emphasis.) The President is attacking democrcy on many fronts. Taken together, they add up to a fascist dictatorship. 

‘Letters From an American’ isn’t the only place on the internet where he is being taken to task; many sites ranging from the Daily Kos to the New York Times’ columnists are criticizing him, but Professor Richardson’s column is a great example, touching many areas that Trump contaminates. Nevertheless, such criticism can cause him to redouble his efforts to destroy American democracy as rapidly as possible.  That doesn’t change what Professor Richardson wrote about, appearing below, and in her other posts. Read them, and other commentators on the political scene, each day!

'September 21, 2025 - Appearing September 22.
Heather Cox Richardson - Letters From an American

“On Friday the Bureau of Labor Statistics postponed the release of the annual report on consumer expenditures—a key report for understanding inflation—without explanation. The BLS has been under stress since President Donald J. Trump fired its head, Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, after the July jobs report showed far weaker hiring statistics than expected as well as a downgrade for previous months. Officials at the BLS said the new report will be “rescheduled to a later date.” 

This weekend, Dan Frosch, Patrick Thomas, and Andrea Peterson of the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Department of Agriculture is ending its annual report on household food security. Those reports began in the 1990s to help state and local officials distribute food assistance. Last year’s report found that 18 million U.S. households experienced food insecurity during 2023. In a statement, the Department of Agriculture said: “These redundant, costly, politicized and extraneous studies do nothing more than fearmonger.”

Colleen Hefflin, an expert on food insecurity, nutrition, and welfare policy at Syracuse University, told the Wall Street Journal reporters: “Not having this measure for 2025 is particularly troubling given the current rise in inflation and deterioration of labor market conditions, two conditions known to increase food insecurity.” Whitney Curry Wimbish of The American Prospect reported last week that food banks across the country are seeing more visits even as immigrants are staying away from them out of concern that their information might be shared or that Immigration and Customs Enforcement might show up. Nutrition scholar Lindsey Smith Taillie of the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health told the reporters: “I think the only reason why you wouldn’t measure it is if you were planning to cut food assistance, because it basically allows you to pretend like we don’t have this food insecurity problem.” The budget reconciliation law the Republicans passed in July cuts funding to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by about 20%, or $186 billion through 2034, the largest cuts to SNAP in its history. This news got less attention last week than the administration’s apparent determination to silence its critics. 

Although, as Jim Rutenberg of the New York Times pointed out on Thursday, Trump promised in his second inaugural address to “immediately stop all government censorship and bring back free speech to America,” what he appeared to mean was that he intended to free up right-wing activists to spread disinformation about elections and Covid-19. Now, in the wake of the murder of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk, as Peter Baker pointed out today in the New York Times, the administration has cracked down on the media and political opponents under the guise of tamping down words that could cause political violence

But, as Baker notes, Trump is making it clear that he is trying to stop speech that criticizes him and his administration. Last week alone, he called for people who yelled at him in a restaurant to be prosecuted and for comedians who made fun of him to be taken off the air, and he sued the New York Times.

On Friday, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that covering the administration negatively is “really illegal.” He went on: “Personally, you can’t take, you can’t have a free airwave if you’re getting free airwaves from the United States government.” As Baker notes, Trump’s chair of the Federal Communications Commission, Brendan Carr, who wrote the chapter of Project 2025 that covers the FCC, has complained that many broadcasters have a liberal bias and that they do not serve the public interest as the FCC requires. 

That attempt to control information is showing clearly at the Pentagon. In February, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threw out long-standing media outlets who had been covering the Pentagon, including NPR, the New York Times, and NBC News, and brought in right-wing outlets including Newsmax and Breitbart. On Friday the Pentagon said it would revoke press credentials for any journalists who gather information, even unclassified information, that the Pentagon has not expressly authorized for release. 

Hegseth has been on a crusade to figure out who is leaking negative stories about him and defense issues under his direction, and he seems to have decided to try to stop their publication rather than the leaks themselves. Although Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell called the changes “basic, common-sense guidelines to protect sensitive information as well as the protection of national security and the safety of all who work at the Pentagon,” Washington Post reporter Scott Nover noted that this position is a “sharp departure” from decades of practice. Until this year, the Pentagon held two televised question and answer sessions a week (and, in my observation, the journalists who covered the Pentagon were excellent). The National Press Club also weighed in on Friday’s changes. “If the news about our military must first be approved by the government, then the public is no longer getting independent reporting,” said club president Mike Balsamo. “It is getting only what officials want them to see. That should alarm every American.” 

On Friday the Pentagon referred to the White House questions about a strike on a third Venezuelan boat that Trump announced on social media. “On my orders, the Secretary of War ordered a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organization conducting narcotrafficking in the USSOUTHCOM area of responsibility,” Trump posted. Trump said three men, whom he called “narcoterrorists,” were killed. He said the military showed him proof that the men in the boats were smuggling drugs, but he has not shared that evidence with lawmakers or the public. As Lara Seligman reported in the Wall Street Journal on September 17, military lawyers and officials from the Defense Department are concerned that decision makers in the Pentagon are ignoring their warnings that the administration’s strikes on the vessels Trump claims are bringing drugs to the U.S. are illegal. David Ignatius of the Washington Post recalls that when he took office, Hegseth purged from the military the judge advocate generals, who are supposed to advise leaders on the rule of law and whether orders are legal. In February, calling the top lawyers in the Army, Navy, and Air Force “roadblocks to orders that are given by a commander in chief,” he fired them. Earlier this month, he announced he was moving as many as 600 JAG officers to serve as immigration judges. 

Also on Friday, Trump announced that companies employing skilled workers who hold temporary H-1B visas would have to pay a $100,000 fee for their entry into the U.S. beginning Sunday. This set off a mad scramble as workers outside the country on business trips, vacations, or family visits rushed to get back into the U.S. before the new rule took effect. Not until Saturday did the administration clarify the new rule does not affect those who already hold visas. 

Friday was a busy day. Trump also told reporters in the Oval Office that he wanted the interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Erik Siebert, “out” after Siebert declined to prosecute New York Attorney General Letitia James, who successfully sued the Trump Organization for fraud, for allegedly committing mortgage fraud. Siebert also declined to prosecute former FBI director James Comey, who refused to kill the investigation into the relationship between members of the 2016 Trump campaign and Russian operatives, for allegedly lying to Congress. Siebert was Trump’s own pick for the job and is a well-regarded career prosecutor. As legal analyst Joyce White Vance noted in Civil Discourse, Siebert managed to win the support of both the Virginia Republican Party and the senators from Virginia, both of whom are Democrats. His refusal to prosecute indicates there was not enough evidence to convict a defendant; Vance notes that’s the standard a prosecutor must meet to seek an indictment. On Friday night, Seibert resigned. On Saturday morning, Trump posted on social media: “He didn’t quit, I fired him!” 

In the evening, he posted on social media a missive that appeared to be intended as a direct message (DM) to Attorney General Pam Bondi. It read: “Pam: I have reviewed over 30 statements and posts saying that, essentially ‘same old story as last time, all talk, no action. Nothing is being done. What about Comey, Adam ‘Shifty’ Schiff, Leticia??? They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done.’... We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!! President DJT.” 

In other words, Trump wants to use the power of the government to punish those he considers his enemies. As Joyce White Vance puts it: “Let’s be clear about what Trump wants. He wants to turn us into a banana republic where the ability to prosecute people becomes a political tool in the hands of the president. That means he wants to exercise the ultimate power to put down any opposition to his rule.” She recalled the comment attributed to Lavrentiy Beria, head of the Soviet secret police under Stalin: “Show me the man and I’ll find the crime.” 

A report from Carol Leonnig and Ken Dilanian of MSNBC yesterday showed what a politicized justice system looks like. They reported that FBI agents last year caught Tom Homan—now Trump’s “border czar”—on video accepting $50,000 in cash from agents posing as business executives after he promised he could help them win government contracts for border enforcement in a second Trump administration. The FBI had opened an investigation after someone told them Homan was soliciting payments in exchange for contracts under a future Trump administration. After obtaining the evidence, the FBI and the Justice Department waited to see whether Homan would provide the aid he offered once he joined the new administration. But the case stalled as soon as Trump took office, and after FBI director Kash Patel recently asked for a status update on the case, Trump appointees officially closed the investigation. The reporters say that when asked about it, the White House, the Justice Department, and the FBI all dismissed the investigation as politically motivated and baseless

While Trump tries to silence his critics, Russia is taking advantage of U.S. inaction to test the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. On Friday, three Russian jets entered the airspace of Estonia. Italian fighters stationed in Estonia as part of NATO’s new Eastern Sentry operation responded and forced the Russian jets out. As Poland did last week after Russian drones and jets entered its airspace, Estonian officials requested consultations with the North Atlantic Council under Article 4 of NATO’s treaty. High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, who hails from Estonia, called Russia’s incursions over Estonia an “extremely dangerous provocation.”


Notes: 
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg3xrrzdr0o https://www.axios.com/2025/09/19/bls-cpi-report-inflation https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2025/09/21/trump-usda-hunger-report-food-insecurity/ 
https://www.wsj.com/economy/trump-administration-cancels-annual-hunger-survey-ca3d3793 
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/10/trumps-big-beautiful-bill-cuts-snap-for-millions-of-families.
html https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/09/17/dhs-calls-media-and-far-left-stop-demonization-president-trump-his-supporters-and https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/business/media/trump-kimmel-cancel-culture-free-speech.html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/19/us/politics/trump-media-news-free-speech.
html https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/21/us/politics/trump-free-speech.
html https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/09/19/pentagon-hegseth-press-unauthorized-material/ 
https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-lawyers-raise-concerns-over-trumps-drug-boat-strikes-b8327a5c https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/09/19/hegseth-national-guard-military-lawyer-purge/ 
https://abcnews.go.com/International/3-killed-3rd-us-strike-alleged-drug-boat/story?id=125757014 
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-s-carried-out-3rd-fatal-strike-on-alleged-drug-smuggling-boat-in-the-caribbean-trump-says https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/restriction-on-entry-of-certain-nonimmigrant-workers/ 
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/trump-raises-fee-h-1b-visas-100000-rcna232525 
https://www.nbcnews.com/world/asia/trump-h1b-visa-fee-travel-tech-workers-india-china-immigration-rcna232695 
https://prospect.org/health/2025-09-17-more-americans-going-hungry-worst-still-to-come/ 
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/20/donald-trump-h1b-visas-overhaul-00574345 https://abcnews.go.com/US/us-attorney-plans-resign-amid-pressure-trump-after/story?id=125750006 
https://abcnews.go.com/US/friend-former-fbi-director-james-comey-subpoenaed-federal/story?id=125666973 "
                                                        *   *
These ‘notes’ Professor Richardson appends to her thoughts are there to show that she just isn’t making this stuff up. 

 And she didn’t get near the lies being sold to the American public by Health (?) and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Mehmet Oz about vaccinations! If you value your health and that of your family, ignore anything they say and trust what your personal physician advises. Please! Believe me, Tylenol or acetaminophen (which the President was unable to pronounce) is not associated with autism. (Try ‘a-set-o-MIN-o-fen’) 

And finally, a word about Attorney-General Bondi. She got her law degree from Stetson University’s Law School, ranked as number 99 among American law schools by US News & World Report, in a tie with three others. I wonder to which other ones she even applied. She is no more an independent voice as Trump’s Attorney-General than she was in that same position in Florida, obedient to Governor DeSantis. She doesn’t know that an Attorney-General is the people’s lawyer, and not the President’s. 

I hope all of this serves to awaken those who do not understand the great threat to our democracy posed by the wannabee-dictator in the White House, those in Congress who support him, and those who, for a variety of reasons, voted for him. 

Even at the massive funeral service for Charlie Kirk, while his widow spoke of love and forgiveness, Trump used the occasion to attempt to mobilize those loyal to him against the rights for which many Americans, including Kirk, have fought and died. Quite simply, Trump is a disgrace to the presidency. I amend that. He’s a disgrace to the nation (period). 

JL 

                                                     * * * 
Housekeeping on Jackspotpourri 

Your comments on this ‘blog’ would be appreciated. My Email address is jacklippman18@gmail.com. 

Forwarding Postings: Please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it (Friends, relatives, enemies, etc.) If you want to send someone the blog, you can just tell them to check it out by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or you can provide a link to that address in your email to them. 

There’s another, perhaps easier, method of forwarding it though! Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, makes that possible. If you click on the tiny envelope with the arrow at the bottom of every posting, you will have the opportunity to list up to ten email addresses to which that blog posting will be forwarded, along with a brief comment from you. Each will receive a link to click on that will directly connect them to the blog. Either way will work, sending them the link to https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com , or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting. 

Email Alerts: If you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do. And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. You can pass those email addresses to me by email at jacklippman18@gmail.com

More on the Sources of Information on Jackspotpourri: The sources of information used by Jackspotpourri include a delivered daily ‘paper’ newspaper (now becoming the South Florida Sun Sentinel) and what appears in my daily email. Be aware that when I open that email, I take these steps: 
 1. I quickly scan the sources of the dozen or two emails I still get each day at my old email address to see from where they are being sent. Most are from vendors which I may have used years ago. Without reading 99% of them, I usually immediately delete them. 
 2. I then go to the email arriving at jacklippman18@gmail.com. Gmail enables ‘Promotion’ emails to be so designated and separated out. I believe their criteria are whether or not they end up asking for donations or if they are no more than advertisements. I ignore most of these ‘Promotion’ emails without reading them, deleting them. A very few, perhaps one or two a day, get moved over to the two or three dozen other emails which I will actually open. 
 3. Then I read my email. 

Besides email, my other source of information is the Google search engine (or other search engines) where I can look up any subject I want. Lately, these search results have been headed by a very generalized summary clearly labeled as being developed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). On occasion I might use such search results, but when I do, I will say that I am doing so. Generally, however, I try not to use such summaries in preparing Jackspotpourri. After such ‘AI’ search results, there follows the other results of my search. Unlike the anonymous AI-generated summaries, the sources of these results are clearly indicated, giving them a greater credibility than the AI summary. I feel that It comes down to who YOU want to be in the driver’s seat in seeking information: yourself or something else (Artificial Intelligence), the structure of which somewhere along the way had to have been created by others, with whose identity I am neither familiar nor comfortable. At least when I read a column by Timothy Snyder, for example, I know from where it comes, and to some extent, what to expect. Caution should be exercised in using Artificial Intelligence. 

JL

                                                            * * * *

Friday, September 19, 2025

September 19, 2025 - First Amendment Rights, Originalism, the Second Amendment, Political Truths, Artificial Intelligence, and Dragons

 


                                                       * * * 
First Amendment Rights Endangered 

Search anywhere you choose on the internet for news of Jimmy Kimmel’s cancelllation by ABC. He joins Steve Colbert as victims of those in power in Washington who believe firmly in free speech only if what is said agrees with the President and those he appoints, often with the approval of a supine Congress, fearful of primary challenges from the right. 

When Tucker Carlson and Heather Cox Richardson seem to agree with one another, it is time to distrust the President and his actions in regard to the First Amendment. Check her comments dated September 18 at https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/ 

JL 

                                                  * * * 

How Originalism Killed the Constitution

A radical legal philosophy has undermined the process of constitutional evolution, and Harvard Professor Jill Lepore has written about it in the Atlantic. The writers of the Constitution went to great pains to keep it from being a static document but one that would be adaptable to change through a very demanding amendment process. 

Not doing that would mean sticking precisely to the Constitution’s language, a position known as ‘originalism.’ The chief modern advocate of this was the late Justice Antonin Scalia, who is responsible for an ‘originalist’ misreading of the Second Amendment causing thousands of deaths through the unregulated proliferation of weapons. More about that follows. 

Justice Scalia - Is there blood on his hands?

JL 
                 
                                                                  * * * 

The Second Amendment Was Originally About Militias … But That Has Changed 

A recipient of Jackspotpourri took my statement in the last posting that there were ‘no absolute political truths’ to amount to an endorsement of the ideas promulgated by the late Charlie Kirk.  

Not so! My statement included that such ideas should be dealt with in a non-violent manner. This may be the wrong time to point out that Kirk regularly excused the very same sort of violence that tragically ended his life, but it cannot be denied that in 2023, in supporting the Second Amendment, he is quoted as having said “It’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.” Words matter. 

Kirk believed the Second Amendment was there to guarantee individuals the right to gun ownership for self-protection as well as being a defense against government tyranny, rather than its clearly stated purpose in its original first thirteen words, enabling States to have armed recruits available to serve in their militias. 

Although this reduction of the Second Amendment to just its final fourteen words was approved by the Supreme Court in 2008 in D.C. vs Heller, I believe that is not what the Founding Fathers intended it to mean, or at least what it was for 219 years until 2008 when a politicized Supreme Court first decided that it was acceptable to ignore the Amendment’s first thirteen words (underlined below) in that decision. 

(The Second Amendment, in its entirety reads as follows: ’A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.’) 

The late Justice Antonin Scalia’s tortured opinion, in effect cancelling the Amendment's first thirteen words, remains the basis for many laws regarding weapons today and has contributed to gun violence, allowing a proliferation of weapons in this country, and thousands of deaths. 

It is my hope that a future SCOTUS decision will return the Second Amendment to what it was about: arming State militias, the predecessors of today’s State National Guard units, something that is now a function of the Federal government and no longer a concern of individual ‘free States.’ 

That leaves the final fourteen words of the Second Amendment standing alone, a right that no one ever challenged, and never needed to be nor intended to be amended into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers, but which is now standing alone there preventing reasonable local ordinances concerning guns from being passed. (That was what D.C. vs Heller was about.) 

                                                      * * 
If my statement regarding there being ‘no absolute political truths’ was inaccurate, it was in that it did not mention that actually there are some self-evident absolute political truths that most Americans recognize, and these are that ‘all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ This is made clear in the Declaration of Independence and made into law in the Constitution. These words will outlive the present occupant of the White House. 

Meanwhile, we should join in recognizing that the acceptance of gun violence by some as an acceptable tool to advance their ideas is inexcusable, and that no American should ever be denied their First Amendment rights by bullets or other acts of violence, nor by words of condemnation by government officials. 

JL 

                                                       * * * 

Here Be Dragons 

When ancient mapmakers reached the limits of what was then human knowledge, they simply labeled such areas with the notation ‘Here Be Dragons.’ Professor Barbara Walter (San Diego State – Univ. of California) so labels her periodic journeys into the unknown where indeed, there may be dragons or similar dangers awaiting us. 

Her September 15 column appears below: 





Why the Killing of Charlie Kirk Feels Different It's a New Phase of Instability – Barbara F. Walter Sept. 15, 2025 

“I’m posting a bit earlier this week. This felt too urgent to hold back. Wednesday was the kind of day that rattles you. My phone lit up. My inbox filled. Emails came from every major outlet in the United States, from London, Sydney, Berlin. I even got an email from People magazine. Everyone wanted to know the same thing: was America sliding into political violence, even civil war? Something about this moment - the murder of Charlie Kirk - feels different. More dangerous. It wasn’t like this after the attempted assassination of Donald Trump in July 2024. It wasn’t like this after Gabby Giffords was shot, or Steve Scalise, or Melissa and Mark Hortman. Those were shocking, tragic events. But the Kirk assassination has put the country on edge in a new way. The question is why. I think there are three reasons. 
1. Our Leaders are Reacting Differently. After high-profile attacks in the past, leaders across the political spectrum almost always responded the same way: they condemned the violence, urged calm, and asked Americans to come together. This time was different. Elon Musk declared, “The Left is the party of murder.” Laura Loomer demanded the government “crack down on the Left… no mercy.” Stephen Miller called on conservatives to “dedicate ourselves to defeating the evil that stole Charlie from this world.” Eric Trump described the assassination as having “awoken that sleeping giant of American conservatism.” Donald Trump called it a “dark moment for America,” saying it was proof that conservatives are under siege. In other words, the immediate response wasn’t about unity. It was mobilization. For the first time, mainstream MAGA voices turned a political killing into a rallying cry. And rhetoric matters. Political scientists have shown that when elites use violent or threatening language - especially when it comes from one’s own side - it increases public support for political violence. What shifted last week was the default script: no longer “thoughts and prayers,” but “prepare for battle.” That is a dangerous move. 
2. Violence is No Longer One-sided. For decades, far-right extremists - white supremacists, militias, anti-government radicals - have carried out the vast majority of lethal domestic terrorism in the United States. They still account for most of it. But in recent years, violence from the far-left has begun to rise. We don’t yet know what motivated Tyler Robinson, or whether he was tied to either camp. But President Trump is already pointing to the murder as proof that the Left is surging in its violence and must be subdued. That is exactly the wrong way to contain violence. Domestic terrorism is a lot easier to control when it comes primarily from one direction, as it has for most of the last twenty years. Once both sides believe the other is targeting them, escalation is much more likely. The scholarly literature is clear: reciprocal violence - when each camp sees the other as an existential threat - sets off cycles of retaliation that are extremely hard to stop especially when people feel they need to act in self-defense. By framing conservatives as victims under siege, Trump is priming his supporters for violence. This is new and provocative. 
3. America’s Law Enforcement Leaders Aren’t What They Used to Be. The contrast with the 1990s is stark. Back then, militias were multiplying across the U.S., feeding off anger at the federal government. The breaking point came in April 1995, when Timothy McVeigh bombed the federal building in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people, including 19 children. Two things followed. First, Americans were horrified. Recruitment into militias collapsed. What had seemed fringe but tolerable now looked monstrous. Second, the FBI acted decisively. They infiltrated groups, prosecuted leaders, and shut down networks. Within a few years, extremist militias were in retreat. That kind of reversal would be almost impossible today. For three reasons. The first is cultural. Surveys now show that more Americans than ever believe political violence can be justified under certain conditions (if an election is stolen, if government overreaches, if their way of life is threatened). Support is no longer confined to the fringes. The second is technological. In 1995, McVeigh’s ideology spread through newsletters and gun shows. Today, extremists use YouTube, Telegram, and TikTok to radicalize millions in real time. And the third is political will. Donald Trump has no interest in curbing far-right extremism. On the contrary, he has excused it, encouraged it, and sometimes embraced it. Under his leadership, the FBI has been stripped of independence and expertise, its senior ranks filled with loyalists rather than professionals. Even if it wanted to act, the bureau no longer has the capacity to replicate its success of the 1990s. That is the difference between then and now. In the 1990s, Americans recoiled and institutions responded. Today, Americans are more polarized, extremists are more connected, and government is more compromised. That makes the threat of more violence bigger and harder to contain. 
Why this matters: Taken together, these three shifts explain why the Kirk assassination feels like a turning point. It is. The danger isn’t only the killing itself. It’s what might come after: political leaders fanning the flames, violence becoming genuinely reciprocal, institutions too weak or unwilling to step in. We can’t undo the violence, but we can decide whether it becomes the spark for escalation or the wake-up call to pull together. 

For a particular great podcast on this subject see Sarah Longwell’s interview with the wonderful Rachel Kleinfeld on The Bulwark. You can find it here: https://www.thebulwark.com/p/you-can-ramp-it-up-or-ramp-it-down.

'Here Be Dragons: Warning Signs from the Edges of Democracy' is free today. But if you enjoyed this post, you can tell 'Here Be Dragons: Warning Signs from the Edges of Democracy' that their writing is valuable by pledging a future subscription. You won't be charged unless they enable payments.” 

                                                      *   *
 Accessing the link with which Professor Walter concludes the above posting will make available to you links to the many, many, blogs, newsletters, and podcasts dealing with current events. Some are free to a limited extent. Most look for paying subscribers as well. They are tempting, but beware; you can spend the rest of your life reading them, forgetting about eating, or sleeping, etc..

JL 

                                                      * * * 
Artificial Intelligence Alert 

We all should be aware that Artificial Intelligence can impact almost everything in our economy and society that up until now depended on the knowledge and skills of individuals. How you engage in creating, making, selling, doing, teaching, etc., all functions that originate in your brain, will be significantly changed. 

 At first, ‘AI’ might seem to be an ally, a useful tool, but eventually your brain might no longer be necessary, nor possibly, even you. Think about it: all human knowledge available at the click of a keyboard to do whatever you and other individuals did yesterday all by themselves. And that includes selecting your government, your mate, and what to eat for breakfast today. 

An article in the New York Times on September 15 suggested ways of approaching this. CLICK HERE  or copy and paste https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/technology/what-exactly-are-ai-companies-trying-to-build-heres-a-guide.html#:~:text=The%20Promise:%20An%20Everything%20Assistant,to%20its%20Alexa%20voice%20assistant. on your device’s browser line for the good (or bad) news. 

JL

                                                        * * * 

Housekeeping on Jackspotpourri

Your comments on this ‘blog’ would be appreciated. My Email address is jacklippman18@gmail.com. 

Forwarding Postings: Please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it (Friends, relatives, enemies, etc.) If you want to send someone the blog, you can just tell them to check it out by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or you can provide a link to that address in your email to them. 

There’s another, perhaps easier, method of forwarding it though! Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, makes that possible. If you click on the tiny envelope with the arrow at the bottom of every posting, you will have the opportunity to list up to ten email addresses to which that blog posting will be forwarded, along with a brief comment from you. Each will receive a link to click on that will directly connect them to the blog. Either way will work, sending them the link to https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com , or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting. 

 Email Alerts: If you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do. And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. You can pass those email addresses to me by email at jacklippman18@gmail.com More on the Sources of Information on Jackspotpourri: The sources of information used by Jackspotpourri include a delivered daily ‘paper’ newspaper (now becoming the South Florida Sun Sentinel) and what appears in my daily email. Be aware that when I open that email, I take these steps: 
 1. I quickly scan the sources of the dozen or two emails I still get each day at my old email address to see from where they are being sent. Most are from vendors which I may have used years ago. Without reading 99% of them, I usually immediately delete them. 
 2. I then go to the email arriving at jacklippman18@gmail.com. Gmail enables ‘Promotion’ emails to be so designated and separated out. I believe their criteria are whether or not they end up asking for donations or if they are no more than advertisements. I ignore most of these ‘Promotion’ emails without reading them, deleting them. A very few, perhaps one or two a day, get moved over to the two or three dozen other emails which I will actually open. 
 3. Then I read my email. 

Besides email, my other source of information is the Google search engine (or other search engines) where I can look up any subject I want. Lately, these search results have been headed by a very generalized summary clearly labeled as being developed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). On occasion I might use such search results, but when I do, I will say that I am doing so. Generally, however, I try not to use such summaries in preparing Jackspotpourri. After such ‘AI’ search results, there follows the other results of my search. Unlike the anonymous AI-generated summaries, the sources of these results are clearly indicated, giving them a greater credibility than the AI summary. I feel that It comes down to who YOU want to be in the driver’s seat in seeking information: yourself or something else (Artificial Intelligence), the structure of which somewhere along the way had to have been created by others, with whose identity I am neither familiar nor comfortable. At least when I read a column by Timothy Snyder, for example, I know from where it comes, and to some extent, what to expect. 

Caution should be exercised in using Artificial Intelligence.

                                                                *   *   *

Saturday, September 13, 2025

September 13, 2025 - Three Related Comments, My Local Newspaper, a Resident's Published Letter, and the Daily Kos

 

                                                         * * * 

Three Related Comments

1. Trump Actively Destroying the FBI When It Is Needed Most

In emasculating the rule of law and the administration of justice, Donald Trump has ruined the nation’s prime law enforcement agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, turning it into a tool of retribution to be used to harass his political opponents, whom he considers to be enemies. 

For full details from the New York Times in their article regarding the important lawsuit filed by three fired career agents. CLICK HERE  or copy and paste https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/10/us/politics/trump-fbi-lawsuit.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20250910&instance_id=162268&nl=breaking-news&regi_id=78918068&segment_id=205643&user_id=02fa158150d34dc186b01b1b8ec7a224 on your device’s browser line. 

And if you cannot access it in full from the Times’ website, ask me to send it to you. 

                                                     * *
2. Kirk Assassination 

Investigation of Wednesday’s assassination of Charlie Kirk, activist leader of conservative youth through his ‘Turning Point’ organization, and ardent supporter of President Trump, required the mobilization of the resources of the FBI, along with local law enforcement in Utah. Unfortunately, the senior FBI Agent with the specific skills and leadership experience required for this task was among those just fired by the Bureau for political reasons. (See #1 above.) Similarly, the Agent-in-Charge of the Bureau’s Salt Lake City office, the territory where the assassination took place, recently met the same fate.

Hence, the FBI’s participation in seeking out the shooter was, in effect, by a ‘second team,’ with the bulk of the work seeming to fall on Utah’s law enforcement authorities. 

FBI head Kash Patel and his top deputy, Dan Bongino, both Trump loyalist appointees without law enforcement experience, were in a situation far over their heads at that point. Announcements regarding the arrest of the shooter have come from the President on a Fox and Friends telecast, where the niceties of the legal process might be glossed over.    

From the Oval Office, President Donald J. Trump had earlier blamed the shooting on “the radical left” and vowed to “find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity, and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country.” Trump was not adverse to fitting the assassination into his agenda. 




It is time for politics to be set aside so that Kirk’s suspected assassin does not benefit from sloppiness on the part of a politicized and inexperienced FBI leadership and the big mouth of a revenge-seeking President, himself a convicted felon. The State of Utah, led by its Governor, Spencer Cox, seems to be up to the job, now that they the suspected assassin has turned himself in at the request of his family. 

                                                     * * 
3. A Denial of Extremism 

There are those among the supposedly non-committed who continually ask believers in opposing ‘extreme political positions’ to try to understand the motives and actions of each other’s side, with the aim of reaching some compromise. Sadly, they are barking up the wrong tree. 

No extremist, on the right or on the left, considers themselves to be an extremist. That bears repeating: No extremist, on the right or on the left, considers themselves to be an extremist. 

To their way of thinking, their beliefs are the correct ones and on the side of righteousness. It is those who disagree with their views whom they label as extremists, with views either far too liberal or far too conservative for them.

The President, ignoring that he is the president of all of the people, goes one step further, referring to those with whom he disagrees as ‘radicals on the left.’ (See #2 above.)  The President should listen to voices like that of Utah’s governor and others urging that those who disagree with one another turn away from suggesting violence. 

The answer may be that really, there are no absolute political truths, and all of us should be open to a variety of political opinions, regardless of their source, and be willing to deal with them in a non-violent manner. That is a lot to be hoped for, but as an example, I agree with HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy, with whom I disagree most of the time, that pharmaceutical advertising on TV should be more strictly regulated. 

JL 

                                                        * * * 

Why a Switch in Newspapers? 

Some of you may be curious as to why I switched to the South Florida SunSentinel from the Palm Beach Post as the daily newspaper delivered to my driveway. Repeatedly I have urged that everyone should have a printed newspaper delivered to them each day, something that can get far more lasting attention than a computer’s or Iphone’s screen. 

To start with, since 2024, the Post, part of the Gannett organization, has not belonged to the Associated Press, depending to a great extent on their sister newspapers, especially Gannett’s flagship USA Today, for non-local news. Believe me, USA Today is no substitute for the Associated Press nor the New York Times articles occasionally seen in the SunSentinel that never see the light of day in the Post. In addition, the Post does not include editorial and opinion pages, important to Jackspotpourri, on Mondays and Tuesdays. 

Also, the Post’s sports section is inadequately staffed, unable to even cover the Miami Marlins, our local Major League baseball team, as bad as they are, nor our local major thoroughbred racetrack, Gulfstream Park.  Finally, while the SunSentinel’s coverage of the southern portion of Palm Beach County is as good as the Post’s, the Post seems to put that region in a back seat compared to areas further north. And their best writer, Frank Cerebino, is retiring. ‘Nuff said? 

JL 

                                                       * * *
Local Resident’s Letter Published 

For those of you who missed it, here’s a letter from a Cascade Lakes resident that appeared the other day in the SunSentinel: 

‘The Teflon King - Right-wing protests are on the decline, according to groups tracking them. Antisemitic and racist protesters believe that marches like the one in Charlottesville, Va., are no longer necessary as they have accomplished their goals with Donald Trump in office. That’s the view of Stewart Rhodes, founder of the far-right group Oath Keepers. Rhodes was part of the Jan. 6 riot and was pardoned in spite of the violence instigated by Trump. Some federal prosecutors who tried them were fired for defying the tyrant in the Oval Office. Ethics, justice and morality have been abandoned. What remains is obeisance to the Teflon King. Wake up, America. - 
Dr. Howard Olarsch, DDS, Boynton Beach’ 

JL 

                                                        * * * 

The Daily Kos 

I find myself more and more taking a good look at the Daily Kos as a news opinion source. It feels no obligation go along with mainstream thinking and speak its mind. It seems to be the only news source that violates the dictum of not criticizing the deceased, and as difficult as that seems at this moment, that includes Charlie Kirk. (See https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/9/11/2342963/-The-whitewashing-of-Charlie-Kirk-s-toxic-legacy-is-underway ) 

While the Daily Kos does ask for donations, it does not make them a prerequisite to getting to its full postings, with which you can agree or disagree. Check it out at https://www.dailykos.com

JL 

                                                             * * * 

Housekeeping on Jackspotpourri

Your comments on this ‘blog’ would be appreciated. My Email address is jacklippman18@gmail.com. 

Forwarding Postings: Please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it (Friends, relatives, enemies, etc.) If you want to send someone the blog, you can just tell them to check it out by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or you can provide a link to that address in your email to them. 

There’s another, perhaps easier, method of forwarding it though! Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, makes that possible. If you click on the tiny envelope with the arrow at the bottom of every posting, you will have the opportunity to list up to ten email addresses to which that blog posting will be forwarded, along with a brief comment from you. Each will receive a link to click on that will directly connect them to the blog. Either way will work, sending them the link to https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com , or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting. 

Email Alerts: If you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do. And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. You can pass those email addresses to me by email at jacklippman18@gmail.com

More on the Sources of Information on Jackspotpourri: The sources of information used by Jackspotpourri include a delivered daily ‘paper’ newspaper (now becoming the South Florida Sun Sentinel) and what appears in my daily email. Be aware that when I open that email, I take these steps: 
 1. I quickly scan the sources of the dozen or two emails I still get each day at my old email address to see from where they are being sent. Most are from vendors which I may have used years ago. Without reading 99% of them, I usually immediately delete them. 
 2. I then go to the email arriving at jacklippman18@gmail.com. Gmail enables ‘Promotion’ emails to be so designated and separated out. I believe their criteria are whether or not they end up asking for donations or if they are no more than advertisements. I ignore most of these ‘Promotion’ emails without reading them, deleting them. A very few, perhaps one or two a day, get moved over to the two or three dozen other emails which I will actually open. 
 3. Then I read my email. Besides email, my other source of information is the Google search engine (or other search engines) where I can look up any subject I want. Lately, these search results have been headed by a very generalized summary clearly labeled as being developed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). On occasion I might use such search results, but when I do, I will say that I am doing so. Generally, however, I try not to use such summaries in preparing Jackspotpourri. After such ‘AI’ search results, there follows the other results of my search. Unlike the anonymous AI-generated summaries, the sources of these results are clearly indicated, giving them a greater credibility than the AI summary. I feel that It comes down to who YOU want to be in the driver’s seat in seeking information: yourself or something else (Artificial Intelligence), the structure of which somewhere along the way had to have been created by others, with whose identity I am neither familiar nor comfortable. At least when I read a column by Timothy Snyder, for example, I know from where it comes, and to some extent, what to expect. Caution should be exercised in using Artificial Intelligence.

                                                                 * * * *

Tuesday, September 9, 2025

September 9, 2025 - Speculation on the Epstein Saga from Josh Marshall, and a Pair of 'Believe it or Nots.'

                                                                       *   *   *

Getting Closer to the Truth About Epstein, Maybe      

On September 6, Professor Heather Cox Richardson’s ‘Letters from an American’ referred to Josh Marshall’s ‘Talking Points Memo’ dated September 6 concerning the Epstein story, vastly increasing its circulation. The stink increases daily. 

For those unfamiliar with Marshall, Wikipedia informs us that Joshua Micah Jesajan-Dorja Marshall is an American journalist and blogger who founded Talking Points Memo. A liberal, he presides over a network of progressive-oriented sites that operate under the TPM Media banner. In 2008, they averaged 400,000 page views on weekdays and 750,000 unique visitors per month. Born in 1969, Marshall has a BA from Princeton and a PhD from Brown University. 
Marshall


Here is what Marshall wrote in his ‘Talking Points Memo’ on September 6 in its entirety; you have to judge it for yourself. For the sake of clarity, I have used red lettering to indicate what it appears Marshall supects was in Donald Trump’s mind as he proceeded along the circuitous path suggested below. As I said earlier, the stink increases daily.  Here goes: 

  “Let me connect a few dots for you that may be a key part of the Trump-Epstein drama and may even be what Trump has been trying to keep hidden in those files. I’m not sure quite what we’re dealing with here. But I think this is significant. 

    Yesterday Speaker Mike Johnson was on the Hill talking to reporters running Trump defense on the Epstein files. It sounds like pretty standard stuff — and then he says this: “When he first heard the rumor he kicked [Epstein] out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant who tried to take this stuff down.” It’s an odd moment. Because Johnson says it in this kind of off-handed way and without explanation like it’s just one in a litany of talking points. But he clearly suggests that Trump played some role bringing about Epstein’s downfall, that he was an FBI informant who presumably told the authorities about Epstein’s sex crimes. The clip got a lot of attention on social media, unsurprisingly. One of Trump’s top surrogates is suggesting that far from being implicated in Epstein’s crimes, Trump is some secret good guy in the shadows, the guy who out of the limelight helped the authorities bring Epstein to justice. 

    Total fantasy, right?  Well, this reminded me of something I saw in one of those recent interviews with journalist Michael Wolff, who has been out in the media letting everyone know that he has some large quantity of taped interviews with Epstein from during Trump’s first presidency but before his rearrest and eventual suicide. Wolff said that Epstein suspected that Trump was the guy who ratted him out to the authorities. So maybe some version of Johnson’s claim isn’t that far-fetched. But of course this isn’t actually exonerating at all. In fact, it implicates Trump about as badly as anything we’ve heard to date. You can’t tell what you don’t know. 

    Trump was in a position to rat out Epstein because he knew all about his operation and had for years. They were close carousing buddies for years, partying and trying to one-up each other, competing to bed young women. Whether that also included girls under 18 for Trump we don’t know for certain. But we have abundant evidence about their carousing and bro-one-upsmanship with women just over 18. Even if he never touched a girl under 18, Trump clearly knew Epstein was. If he’s the one who ratted Epstein out to the authorities leading to his 2008 plea deal, that only confirms his knowledge more clearly. 

    But the details of why Trump appears to have turned on Epstein are key too. Wolff lays out the details starting just after minute 32 in this interview, which you can watch on Youtube. There’s a lot going on here. So I’ll try to walk you through the key points. (For more detail and flavor, I strongly recommend watching that five or six minute part of the interview.) 

    Epstein was trying to buy a South Florida estate. He brought Trump along to see it one time. A short time later Epstein found out that Trump had gone behind his back and placed a higher and ultimately successful bid on the property. He’d snatched it out from under him with a much higher bid. The problem was that Trump’s entire empire in 2004 was teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. It made no sense that Trump was coming up with $41 million to buy this property. Epstein suspected that Trump was acting as a front for a Russian oligarch as a money-laundering scheme. And in fact Trump did purchase and flip the estate two years later to a Russian oligarch named Dmitry Rybolovlev for $95 million, or a profit of over $50 million dollars.

    Epstein was pissed for his own reasons (he wanted the estate). But he also suspected the money laundering scheme. So he threatened Trump that he would bring the whole thing out into the open through a series of lawsuits. Right about this same time authorities got a tip about Epstein’s activities which started the investigation that led to his eventual 2008 plea deal. Two of these points are well-known. The transaction with the Russian oligarch has been written about extensively and was the subject of criminal probes. Of course, Trump denies it was money-laundering. But that part of this story is well-known. It’s also well-known that Trump and Epstein fell out over this real estate transaction. Those two parts of what I’m explaining are established parts of the Trump story. What’s new is the idea that Trump was either the key source who started the Epstein investigation or one of them and that he did this to retaliate against Epstein’s threats and protect himself from being exposed in a money laundering scheme. 

    I can’t stress this point enough: You can’t tell what you don’t know. This isn’t an accusation. It’s formal logic. So even if we accept the idea that Trump played a role in Epstein’s downfall, it’s not exonerating. It shows what we’ve long suspected: that Trump had known about Epstein’s operation for years and was fine with it. (That’s assuming for the moment he wasn’t a direct participant — it’s the weekend, I’m being generous.) He only made a call when Epstein was threatening to expose a money laundering scheme. Wolff said this a few weeks ago, apparently on the basis of recorded interviews from 2018 and 2019. But last night I saw a few articles from that period that strongly hinted at something like this. So I suspect reporters had heard something about this but couldn’t quite nail it down. In other words, I think this has been known as a rumor at least for some time. So why did Johnson say this? It’s conceivable, I guess, that he was just riffing and that there’s nothing to it. But that’s a helluva riff. I don’t think you’re just spitballing and land on the idea that the president of the United States was a confidential source who had inside knowledge and started the Epstein investigation. 

    My best guess is that Johnson said this because Epstein was right and Trump did rat him out to the authorities. But as we said, this is not a good story for Trump, so why say it? Again, the best explanation is that it’s in those files the DOJ is sitting on. The White House fears it’s going to come out and so they’re putting the best spin on it they can. Trump was a real life Bruce Wayne type richie, wheeling and dealing by day, helping the authorities take down bad guys in the shadows. With Trump’s most ardent supporters, they might get some traction with that. But again, as noted above, it’s actually super damning. Yeah I knew he was a big time pedophile and we were big pals and partied together all the time and I was fine with it. But then he tried to expose my money laundering scheme so I called my friends at the FBI. I don’t think that’s a great story. 

    Needless to say, I’ve strung together several links in a chain here. There’s Johnson’s off-hand comment, the fact that what Epstein suspected or said he suspected isn’t necessarily what happened, there’s the lack of direct proof for Trump notifying authorities. But I think if you tug at the chain you’ll find that each link in the chain is actually pretty strong. So this is worth keeping an eye on because I think Johnson said it for a reason.” 

JL 

                                                    * * * 

Believe It or Not #1 

As an example of how terrible the Trump administration is, check the details of the many news reports on these actions which I am sure you have read about. 

1. Trump wants to create jobs in this country to replace jobs in other countries producing imports to this country. 
2. Tariffs on these imports from these other countries are one of his threats or tools. 
3. South Korea was agreeable to playing along with this and was building a battery plant for Korean vehicles in Georgia, to employ Americans here instead of Koreans in South Korea. 
4. South Korea sent its experts and experienced workers to recruit and train Americans to operate the plant it was building here to appease Trump. 
5. Some had visas to allow them to come here to do this work and others were admitted as part of the deal Trump had supposedly negotiated during some of his more lucid moments. 
6. ICE, charged by the President to meet a quota of deportable immigrants, became aware of a big factory being built in Georgia employing a lot of immigrants, raided the place and arrested over 450 employees, mostly from South Korea. 
7. This became a diplomatic issue between the United States and one of its strongest allies. 
8. South Korea is sending a plane to evacuate its imprisoned workers here and construction of the plant has ceased. 
9. It is rumored that the President has added a proctologist to his staff of economists to help him locate his head. 

JL

                                                      * * * 

Believe it or Not #2 

(From the South Florida SunSentinel, Fri., Sept. 5. – First paragraphs of an article from the ‘News Service of Florida’) 

 ‘Tallahassee – Talon Tactical Outfitters west of Tallahassee has bulked up its inventory of hunting rifles and shotguns. Starting Monday and running through the end of the year, Florida will provide a sales-tax exemption on a variety of hunting equipment, the first time a state tax ‘holiday’ includes guns and ammunition. JD Johnson, an owner of Talon, which also has a neighboring firing range, said Tuesday several customers had already reached out to him about plans to make purchases afater the discount period begins … ‘ 

Jackspotpourri can recommend 49 other States for vacations or retirement, but certainly, not Florida, site of mass shootings such as those at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando and at a high school in Parkland. There are a lot of guns in the Sunshine State. Also a lot of crazy people. They sense that Governor DeSantis has placed a welcome mat out for them at the State line and have flocked here. And that includes the Surgeon General that DeSantis appointed, among the nut-jobs he fancies, possibly crazier than the Governor himself. But that’s another story. 

JL

                                                * * *

Wrapping Up 'Sic Semper Tyrannis'

John Wilkes Booth’s assassination of Abraham Lincoln in 1865 was reprehensible and the act of a madman. As the ‘hit man’ in a plot against the president, his supposed words, ‘Sic semper tyrannis’ as he squeezed the trigger reflected his pathological hatred of the president. 

Wikipedia as well as Artificial Intelligence, in defining this Latin phrase translatable as "thus always to tyrants," points out that In contemporary parlance, it can be understood as meaning the overthrowning of a tyrant and their removal from power, and not the assassination that Booth, who considered Lincoln to be a tyrant, carrried out.  In a democratic republic, there are legal means of overthrowing tyrants to be pursued.
 
 JL 

                                                          * * * 

Housekeeping on Jackspotpourri 

Your comments on this ‘blog’ would be appreciated. My Email address is jacklippman18@gmail.com. 

 Forwarding Postings: Please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it (Friends, relatives, enemies, etc.) If you want to send someone the blog, you can just tell them to check it out by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or you can provide a link to that address in your email to them. 

There’s another, perhaps easier, method of forwarding it though! Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, makes that possible. If you click on the tiny envelope with the arrow at the bottom of every posting, you will have the opportunity to list up to ten email addresses to which that blog posting will be forwarded, along with a brief comment from you. Each will receive a link to click on that will directly connect them to the blog. Either way will work, sending them the link to https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com , or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting.

Email Alerts: If you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do. And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. You can pass those email addresses to me by email at jacklippman18@gmail.com

More on the Sources of Information on Jackspotpourri: The sources of information used by Jackspotpourri include a delivered daily ‘paper’ newspaper (now becoming the South Florida Sun Sentinel) and what appears in my daily email. Be aware that when I open that email, I take these steps: 
 1. I quickly scan the sources of the dozen or two emails I still get each day at my old email address to see from where they are being sent. Most are from vendors which I may have used years ago. Without reading 99% of them, I usually immediately delete them. 
 2. I then go to the email arriving at jacklippman18@gmail.com. Gmail enables ‘Promotion’ emails to be so designated and separated out. I believe their criteria are whether or not they end up asking for donations or if they are no more than advertisements. I ignore most of these ‘Promotion’ emails without reading them, deleting them. A very few, perhaps one or two a day, get moved over to the two or three dozen other emails which I will actually open. 
 3. Then I read my email. 

Besides email, my other source of information is the Google search engine (or other search engines) where I can look up any subject I want. Lately, these search results have been headed by a very generalized summary clearly labeled as being developed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). On occasion I might use such search results, but when I do, I will say that I am doing so. Generally, however, I try not to use such summaries in preparing Jackspotpourri. After such ‘AI’ search results, there follows the other results of my search. Unlike the anonymous AI-generated summaries, the sources of these results are clearly indicated, giving them a greater credibility than the AI summary. 

I feel that It comes down to who YOU want to be in the driver’s seat in seeking information: yourself or something else (Artificial Intelligence), the structure of which somewhere along the way had to have been created by others, with whose identity I am neither familiar nor comfortable. At least when I read a column by Timothy Snyder, for example, I know from where it comes, and to some extent, what to expect. 

Caution should be exercised in using Artificial Intelligence.

JL  

                                                         *   *   *   *