* * *
It Starts With Crosswalks The President’s opposition to Americans being aWOKEn to the need for our culture to address diversity and inclusion issues has been echoed by Florida’s governor in his attack on rainbow-hued street crossings that recognize the LGBTQ populations in communities that choose to do so.
This is very dangerous territory into which Trump and DeSantis (and others) are treading. It is the first step in putting those populations in far greater danger than even they may realize. This was the philosophy of Nazi Germany where it led to concentration camps and gas chambers for some of them.
I don’t believe that neither Trump nor DeSantis understand that banning rainbow-hued crosswalks that carry this particular message of recognition caters to the hatreds of America’s bigots. All decent Americans should urge both of them, and those who blindly support their actions, to recognize where this can lead and change their positions.
And as for those bigoted Americans, nothing will stop them from continuing to vote for Trump-supporting Republicans.
JL
* * *
Minneapolis Church School Shooting Must Be a High SCOTUS Priority
Enough of thoughts and prayers!
We have traveled that route too often!
The misguided majority 5-4 decision in D.C. vs Heller in 2008 must be reversed. And this must be accomplished before any other matters are considered by the Supreme Court! It must take priority over the other papers piled on the Justices' desks.
Here is the Second Amendment in full: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Before Justice Antonin Scalia’s wrongheaded opinion with which four other Justices concurred, the District of Columbia had tough laws regarding keeping a weapon at home, even for self-defense. Scalia wrote that such laws were unconstitutional in view of the final fourteen words of the Second Amendment, disregarding its first thirteen words.
Since then, gun possession and gun violence have proliferated, causing thousands of deaths, most of which are attributable to Justice Scalia’s opinion opening the weapons market to any screwball who wanted to buy a gun. Prior to D.C. vs Heller, the first thirteen words of the Amendment meant something and were not ignored so easily as Justice Scalia ignored them.
The Second Amendment protects the rights of States to have armed militias, which in those days meant that volunteers were expected to bring their own guns; it is not there for the benefit of armed nut jobs running loose in our society, as too many Americans believe is their right.
JL
* * *
A Fresh Take on the Second Amendment
And while the Second Amendment is in the spotlight again, let’s take a look at it from another angle. Its language sits there, four paragraphs directly above.
Those concerned with the availability of weapons are familiar with the language of the Second Amendment, particularly its final fourteen words. But there is more than that to the Second Amendment.
Note that its first thirteen words presuppose the necessity of States forming their own militias, now referred to as National Guard units, with their existence being necessary to the security of the State. That is what it says. Read it!
Why then, is command of these State National Guard units vested somewhere else other than within those States’ governments? How does it end up with the President of the United States? How did this come to be?
Here’s how: A president can claim that he has the power to control state militias (National Guard units) based on (1) the Commander in Chief Clause of Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, which allows the President to call state militias into federal service, and (2) the Insurrection Act, a Federal law authorizing the use of state and federal military forces to suppress insurrections and enforce federal law. That's how!
An ’AI” search into this presidential control concludes that such powers are not unlimited and are typically used in times of national crisis, but that they require only the federalization of the National Guard, not direct control over all state militias.
I do not see any national crises, invasions, or insurrections going on and I don’t see any federal laws, all of which originate and are passed by Congress, being violated to the extent that the National Guard need be federalized to enforce them. Merely saying, without any evidence, that crime is rampant in places like Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, or New York, without evidence of it being so is not enough.
In no uncertain terms, California Governor Newsom and Illinois Governor Pritzker have pointed this out to the President. It probably will take a Supreme Court ruling to decide if they are correct. Meanwhile, they, and not Donald Trump, ought to be retaining command of the National Guard units in their States, which is not the case at this moment.
I would hope the Attorneys-General of California and Illinois are drafting appropriate litigation right now to remove the National Guard units from presidential control. The conditions specified in Article Two, Section Two, of the Constitution, and the Insurrection Act have not been met. And it will be up to the Supreme Court to say so!
Getting back to the purpose of the Second Amendment, included among the Founding Fathers were some delegates to the 1789 Constitutional convention who feared Federal military pressure on States where slavery existed. They insisted on the ability to raise militia to guarantee their freedom as free States, to oppose any use of Federal troops against them that would affect their right to own slaves. That’s what their militia, today’s National Guard units, and the Second Amendment were intended for.
Once Governors Newsom and Pritzker regain control of their States’ militias (or National Guard units) which the President has seized using a daily barrage of lies, they will be in a position to better challenge illegal activities threatening their States’ security, specifically actions by the FBI and ICE.
JL
* * *
A Strange Marriage – Artificial Intelligence and Nuclear Power
When one does a search or asks a question on Google (or other traditional search engines), their programs go to work to seek a response. Similarly, when one does a search (or asks a question) through Artificial Intelligence, its programs go into action. An ‘AI” search, however, is much more thorough, sweeping up and organizing data that a Google search never touches, and rewriting it in what amounts to a neutral language or specific format.
Both searches require electrical power, not only for the user’s plugged-in or internet-connected device, but to a far greater extent for the operation of the Google or ‘AI’ search programs. The electrical power for these searches is concentrated in data centers the energy for which is today mostly sourced by fossil fuels.
The amount of electrical energy required to operate Artificial Intelligence programs, particularly in government and business activities, is already taxing these sources of power. Enormous new power plants are being envisioned or already being started to satisfy ‘AI’s tremendous appetite as it chews through mountain ranges of data which traditional search engines, like Google, never approach nor then reassemble into narrative or usable statistical formats as does ‘AI.’
Running a single ‘AI’ data center, it is reported by ‘AI,’ can use as much power as an entire city of 50,000 requires each day. If Artificial Intelligence is to prevail, its data centers must be paired with something other than fossil fuel based power, with nuclear energy the likely candidate. The closed Three Mile Island nuclear plant on the Susquehanna River in Pennsylvania, for example, may fit into those plans. Microsoft has already built a data center adjacent to it, and is heavily committed to the project. Both are pictured below.
But Paul Krugman’s August 27 posting (paulkrugman.substack.com) still has faith in solar and wind power, both of which the President opposes. Could that be because of the government’s investment in companies involved with data centers like the one close to the old, and now-renamed, Three Mile Island nuclear plant?
The government controls ten percent of Intel and has eased the way for businesses like NVIDIA, IBM and SoftBank to commit billions of dollars to manufacturing in the U.S. and the support of artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies.
So why would they bet on solar and wind technologies when they have put their money down on other sources of electric power, especially nuclear?
JL
* * *
Sports Commentary
I don’t understand why there is a major league baseball team in South Florida.
The Marlins’ attendance is usually below nine or ten thousand, impressive for a minor league franchise but pathetic for a major league team. Attendance only exceeds four figures when retirees, Yankee, Mets, or even Red Sox fans, fill otherwise empty seats when their old teams come to town.
Don’t compare them with the Oakland/Las Vegas Athletics or the Tampa Bay Rays, both of which are temporarily playing in minor league or spring training ballparks for various reasons. Once they are in their new or reconstructed facilities, the Marlins will return to unquestioned dominance of the attendance cellar. Could their ownership like it that way, probably losing money on the team, as a hedge against profits made elsewhere? Hmmm.
JL
* * *
Here’s a couple of sites you might find worthwhile:
simonwdc@substack.com - Check out his ‘Hopium Chronicles’ dated August 26 that touches a lot of bases.
barbarafwalter@substack.com - On August 27 offers the views of a pessimistic sociologist who sees little hope for change in a piece titled ‘The Animal Within Us.’
JL
* * *
Housekeeping on Jackspotpourri
Your comments on this ‘blog’ would be appreciated. My Email address is jacklippman18@gmail.com.
Forwarding Postings: Please forward this posting to anyone you think might benefit from reading it (Friends, relatives, enemies, etc.) If you want to send someone the blog, you can just tell them to check it out by visiting https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com or you can provide a link to that address in your email to them.
There’s another, perhaps easier, method of forwarding it though! Google Blogspot, the platform on which Jackspotpourri is prepared, makes that possible. If you click on the tiny envelope with the arrow at the bottom of every posting, you will have the opportunity to list up to ten email addresses to which that blog posting will be forwarded, along with a brief comment from you. Each will receive a link to click on that will directly connect them to the blog. Either way will work, sending them the link to https://jackspotpourri.blogspot.com , or clicking on the envelope at the bottom of this posting.
Email Alerts: If you are NOT receiving emails from me alerting you each time there is a new posting on Jackspotpourri, just send me your email address and we’ll see that you do. And if you are forwarding a posting to someone, you might suggest that they do the same, so they will be similarly alerted. You can pass those email addresses to me by email at jacklippman18@gmail.com
More on the Sources of Information on Jackspotpourri: The sources of information used by Jackspotpourri include a delivered daily ‘paper’ newspaper (now becoming the South Florida Sun Sentinel) and what appears in my daily email. Be aware that when I open that email, I take these steps:
1. I quickly scan the sources of the dozen or two emails I still get each day at my old email address to see from where they are being sent. Most are from vendors which I may have used years ago. Without reading 99% of them, I usually immediately delete them.
2. I then go to the email arriving at jacklippman18@gmail.com. Gmail enables ‘Promotion’ emails to be so designated and separated out. I believe their criteria are whether or not they end up asking for donations or if they are no more than advertisements. I ignore most of these ‘Promotion’ emails without reading them, deleting them. A very few, perhaps one or two a day, get moved over to the two or three dozen other emails which I will actually open.
3. Then I read my email.
Besides email, my other source of information is the Google search engine (or other search engines) where I can look up any subject I want. Lately, these search results have been headed by a very generalized summary clearly labeled as being developed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). On occasion I might use such search results, but when I do, I will say that I am doing so. Generally, however, I try not to use such summaries in preparing Jackspotpourri.
After such ‘AI’ search results, there follows the other results of my search. Unlike the anonymous AI-generated summaries, the sources of these results are clearly indicated, giving them a greater credibility than the AI summary. I feel that It comes down to who YOU want to be in the driver’s seat in seeking information: yourself or something else (Artificial Intelligence), the structure of which somewhere along the way had to have been created by others, with whose identity I am neither familiar nor comfortable. At least when I read a column by Timothy Snyder, for example, I know from where it comes, and to some extent, what to expect.
Caution should be exercised in using Artificial Intelligence.
JL
* * * *